Mexican consumers can now fight the power
The spirit of Pancho Villa apparently rides on as Mexican consumers will soon have the ability to wage class action war on the forces of tyrannical corporate oppression.
September 02, 2011 at 07:51 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The spirit of Pancho Villa apparently rides on as Mexican consumers will soon have the ability to wage class action war on the forces of tyrannical corporate oppression.
The General Congress of the United Mexican States enacted the first law allowing consumers to bring class action suits in April, but the law was finally published this week in the country's official government publication, the Official Gazette of the Federation. The law is slated to take effect March 1, 2012.
The effects of the new legislation will have widespread implications for companies across numerous sectors. The law will allow three types of class action claims: consumer, financial and environmental, and will be divided into three categories dependent upon the types of rights as defined by legal doctrine in civil law countries.
The legislation, however, includes broadly defined requirements that must be satisfied in order for a claim to proceed as a class action, according to a release from Chadbourne & Parke, “including that the prospective class members must be in the same common factual or legal circumstances, and that a clear relationship exist between the initiated action and the damage to the class. In addition, in order to obtain the benefit of the statute's provisions, the subject matter of the claim must be proper for class-wide disposition.”
Another tenet is that the law includes a loser pays provision, and holds that attorney's fees will be subject to caps in an effort to avoid abuse.
For more insight into the new legislation, read coverage in the Wall Street Journal and analysis from Shook, Hardy & Bacon.
The spirit of Pancho Villa apparently rides on as Mexican consumers will soon have the ability to wage class action war on the forces of tyrannical corporate oppression.
The General Congress of the United Mexican States enacted the first law allowing consumers to bring class action suits in April, but the law was finally published this week in the country's official government publication, the Official Gazette of the Federation. The law is slated to take effect March 1, 2012.
The effects of the new legislation will have widespread implications for companies across numerous sectors. The law will allow three types of class action claims: consumer, financial and environmental, and will be divided into three categories dependent upon the types of rights as defined by legal doctrine in civil law countries.
The legislation, however, includes broadly defined requirements that must be satisfied in order for a claim to proceed as a class action, according to a release from
Another tenet is that the law includes a loser pays provision, and holds that attorney's fees will be subject to caps in an effort to avoid abuse.
For more insight into the new legislation, read coverage in the Wall Street Journal and analysis from
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readIn-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250