Mexican consumers can now fight the power
The spirit of Pancho Villa apparently rides on as Mexican consumers will soon have the ability to wage class action war on the forces of tyrannical corporate oppression.
September 02, 2011 at 07:51 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The spirit of Pancho Villa apparently rides on as Mexican consumers will soon have the ability to wage class action war on the forces of tyrannical corporate oppression.
The General Congress of the United Mexican States enacted the first law allowing consumers to bring class action suits in April, but the law was finally published this week in the country's official government publication, the Official Gazette of the Federation. The law is slated to take effect March 1, 2012.
The effects of the new legislation will have widespread implications for companies across numerous sectors. The law will allow three types of class action claims: consumer, financial and environmental, and will be divided into three categories dependent upon the types of rights as defined by legal doctrine in civil law countries.
The legislation, however, includes broadly defined requirements that must be satisfied in order for a claim to proceed as a class action, according to a release from Chadbourne & Parke, “including that the prospective class members must be in the same common factual or legal circumstances, and that a clear relationship exist between the initiated action and the damage to the class. In addition, in order to obtain the benefit of the statute's provisions, the subject matter of the claim must be proper for class-wide disposition.”
Another tenet is that the law includes a loser pays provision, and holds that attorney's fees will be subject to caps in an effort to avoid abuse.
For more insight into the new legislation, read coverage in the Wall Street Journal and analysis from Shook, Hardy & Bacon.
The spirit of Pancho Villa apparently rides on as Mexican consumers will soon have the ability to wage class action war on the forces of tyrannical corporate oppression.
The General Congress of the United Mexican States enacted the first law allowing consumers to bring class action suits in April, but the law was finally published this week in the country's official government publication, the Official Gazette of the Federation. The law is slated to take effect March 1, 2012.
The effects of the new legislation will have widespread implications for companies across numerous sectors. The law will allow three types of class action claims: consumer, financial and environmental, and will be divided into three categories dependent upon the types of rights as defined by legal doctrine in civil law countries.
The legislation, however, includes broadly defined requirements that must be satisfied in order for a claim to proceed as a class action, according to a release from
Another tenet is that the law includes a loser pays provision, and holds that attorney's fees will be subject to caps in an effort to avoid abuse.
For more insight into the new legislation, read coverage in the Wall Street Journal and analysis from
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250