Rajaratnam asks for shorter prison sentence
Galleon Group co-founder Raj Rajaratnam is asking a judge to shorten the governments proposed prison sentence for his involvement in a massive insider trading case.
September 12, 2011 at 09:06 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Galleon Group co-founder Raj Rajaratnam is asking a judge to shorten the government's proposed prison sentence for his involvement in a massive insider trading case.
The government is requesting that Rajaratnam, who was convicted in May on all 14 conspiracy and securities fraud criminal counts against him, be sentenced to between 19 ½ and 24 ½ years in prison.
But according to Bloomberg, 54-year-old Rajaratnam says the punishment is “grotesquely severe.” On Sept. 9, he asked U.S. District Judge Richard Holwell to reduce the proposed sentence so he won't have to die in prison.
“This court's role is not to validate a prosecutorial public relations effort, nor is it to single out one man to serve as the whipping boy for Wall Street misdeeds,” Rajartnam said in a court filing.
Rajaratnam asserted in his court filing that his proposed punishment exceeds sentences for criminals convicted of arson, child pornography, kidnapping, robbery and sexual abuse. Many experts note that white-collar criminals are continuously facing stricter punishments comparable to the aforementioned hard criminals.
Rajartnam's sentencing is scheduled for Sept. 27.
Galleon Group co-founder Raj Rajaratnam is asking a judge to shorten the government's proposed prison sentence for his involvement in a massive insider trading case.
The government is requesting that Rajaratnam, who was convicted in May on all 14 conspiracy and securities fraud criminal counts against him, be sentenced to between 19 ½ and 24 ½ years in prison.
But according to Bloomberg, 54-year-old Rajaratnam says the punishment is “grotesquely severe.” On Sept. 9, he asked U.S. District Judge Richard Holwell to reduce the proposed sentence so he won't have to die in prison.
“This court's role is not to validate a prosecutorial public relations effort, nor is it to single out one man to serve as the whipping boy for Wall Street misdeeds,” Rajartnam said in a court filing.
Rajaratnam asserted in his court filing that his proposed punishment exceeds sentences for criminals convicted of arson, child pornography, kidnapping, robbery and sexual abuse. Many experts note that white-collar criminals are continuously facing stricter punishments comparable to the aforementioned hard criminals.
Rajartnam's sentencing is scheduled for Sept. 27.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute readTurning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Many LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
- 2Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 3U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 4From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 5How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250