Deloitte sued for $7.6 billion
If the bean counters cant count, or choose not to report what they see, who can you trust? Accounting firm Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Ltd. is now the defendant in a pair of lawsuits alleging it failed to detect (or report) massive fraud spanning nearly a decade at a now-defunct Florida...
September 27, 2011 at 08:58 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
If the bean counters can't count, or choose not to report what they see, who can you trust? Accounting firm Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Ltd. is now the defendant in a pair of lawsuits alleging it failed to detect (or report) massive fraud spanning nearly a decade at a now-defunct Florida mortgage provider that led to one of the largest prosecutions to come out of the financial crisis.
Mortgage company Taylor Bean & Whitaker and Ocala Funding LLC, a separate company that purchased mortgages from Taylor Bean totaling in the hundreds of millions of dollars, both filed suits against Deloitte in Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The companies filed the suits on behalf of the bankruptcy trustee attempting to appease Taylor Bean's creditors.
The lawsuits, which are asking for $7.6 billion in damages, assert that Deloitte certified Taylor Bean's books for years until it dropped the mortgage company in 2009 immediately prior to the company's shutdown. Deloitte's certifications allegedly were crucial to helping the mortgage firm to maintain its appearance as an upstanding, profitable business.
What may be particularly damning for Deloitte is that Ocala Funding's suit reportedly includes emails in which Deloitte's auditors raised hackles over financial transactions, including a $6 billion deal that was analyzed just hours prior to the audit's completion.
The mortgage fraud at Taylor Bean began in 2002 and continued until the company shuttered its doors two years ago. Federal agents raided the firm in August 2009. At its height, Taylor Bean originated about $30 billion in loans and employed nearly 2,500 workers. At the time, seven Taylor Bean executives were convicted of criminal charges. Former chairman Lee Farkas was among them. He was sentenced in June to 30 years in federal prison.
For more, read coverage at the Huffington Post.
If the bean counters can't count, or choose not to report what they see, who can you trust? Accounting firm
Mortgage company Taylor Bean & Whitaker and Ocala Funding LLC, a separate company that purchased mortgages from Taylor Bean totaling in the hundreds of millions of dollars, both filed suits against
The lawsuits, which are asking for $7.6 billion in damages, assert that
What may be particularly damning for
The mortgage fraud at Taylor Bean began in 2002 and continued until the company shuttered its doors two years ago. Federal agents raided the firm in August 2009. At its height, Taylor Bean originated about $30 billion in loans and employed nearly 2,500 workers. At the time, seven Taylor Bean executives were convicted of criminal charges. Former chairman Lee Farkas was among them. He was sentenced in June to 30 years in federal prison.
For more, read coverage at the Huffington Post.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250