Women GCs at Fortune 500 companies on the rise
According to a recent study released by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association (MCCA), more women were serving as general counsel in Fortune 500 companies in 2010 than ever before.
October 05, 2011 at 06:15 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
According to a recent study released by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association (MCCA), more women were serving as general counsel in Fortune 500 companies in 2010 than ever before.
The MCCA's Survey of Fortune 500 and Fortune 1000 Women and Minority General Counsel showed that 101 of the Fortune 500 GCs last year were women. That is a 7 percent increase over the number of women GCs in the Fortune 500 the previous year.
The survey also said:
- Nearly 15% of the women GCs at Fortune 500 companies were minorities—the largest percentage since the survey launched 12 years ago
- 40% of the women GCs at Fortune 500 companies came from four states: California, New York, Texas and Illinois
- Women GCs at Fortune 500 companies were represented in many industries, with the highest concentration in retail (15.8%), energy (13.4%) and electronics/office equipment (11%)
- The Fortune 1000 companies—represented in the 501 to 1000 companies—also saw an increase in women GCs, from 80 in 2009 to 82 in 2010
“Since MCCA started tracking this information in 1999, the number of women serving as general counsel at Fortune 500 companies has grown 129 percent, a remarkable achievement,” MCCA President and CEO Joseph K. West said in a statement. “This represents an important change in legal industry culture, but these women have also demonstrated outstanding legal and leadership skills to earn such prestigious posts.”
The news is especially timely, as Anastasia Kelly, a DLA Piper partner and former Fortune 500 GC, recently announced the launch of Project 5-165, a call to action which aims to get 165 women appointed to GC positions in the Fortune 500 within the next five years (see “Purposeful Project”). Read more of InsideCounsel's coverage of women in the corporate legal profession.
The full survey report is published in the September/October issue of Diversity at the Bar.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
White Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Beyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Trending Stories
- 1Special Series Part 4: The Statutory Guardrails Impermissibly Bind Future Legislatures
- 2New York Court of Appeals Blocks Trump Attempt to Stay Friday Sentencing
- 3'Self-Diagnosed Nickel Allergy' Fails to Find Success in Med-Mal Suit, 8th Circuit Rules
- 4Eversheds Sutherland Adds Hunton Andrews Energy Lawyer With Cross-Border Experience
- 5Balancing Judicial Authority: Understanding Sanctions, Severance, and Interferences
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
