3 keys to effective records management programs
Successful implementation can be found in three simple lettersPPT.
October 12, 2011 at 06:57 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In my previous articles, I have talked about cleaning out unnecessary electronically stored information (ESI) and developing an effective records retention program. Now, I'd like to turn to execution. A records management policy and records retention schedule are worth little more than the bits and bytes they are made up of unless you actually implement them. And the key to successful implementation can be found in three simple letters—PPT: people, process and technology.
1. People
Yes, records management would be a whole lot easier if we could just eliminate the humans. But people are going to continue creating, saving, sending and deleting ESI for now, so the success of your records management program requires that you get them on board. People are important in two key respects: First, they have to understand the records management program and their responsibilities under it. Second, their role has to be as simple and undisruptive as is possible if you want them to comply.
Understanding and acceptance come through training. Formal training is important not only to help employees understand the records management program, but also because it reinforces the fact that the program is a priority. Employees should be trained when they are hired, whenever the program is significantly updated and on a periodic basis thereafter. If possible, the training should be interactive and include a testing component to increase the likelihood that information will be retained.
Compliance, however, requires more than simply understanding the program and its expectations. If the expectations are unreasonable, the result will be equally bad. Therefore, it will be important to simplify the process for individual custodians as much as possible by simplifying records classifications, reducing the number of decisions to be made and leveraging technology where possible.
2. Process
Before you can properly train people, you need to develop and document your processes. A policy provides overall direction. Schedules provide guidance for specific records. Process enables execution.
The records management process must include detailed procedures for how individual employees will execute the records management program as well as necessary reference materials. Among other things, you will need to have a file plan for unstructured data, including email. You will need to establish procedures for individual custodians to follow when categorizing records within your information systems. IT stewards of non-custodial data repositories also will require procedures for managing data in such systems.
The complete set of processes and procedures will be dependent on your business' information environment, and is far beyond the scope of this article, but it is a critical component of success. As I've mentioned before, don't let the sheer scope of the endeavor stop you from starting. Begin, if you need to, with a single information system, and move on from there.
3. Technology
I've said it before and I'll say it here again: technology is not a panacea. There is no easy button, so don't think you can dump records management onto the collective lap of IT and walk away. That being said, technology will be a critical, indispensible and unavoidable component of the program. The mantra for technology should be: Leverage what you have, acquire what you need, and retire or repurpose what you don't.
The technologies that we use each and every day (such as the email system that delivered you notification that this article had posted on InsideCounsel) are fabulous and have far more powerful records management capabilities than we tend to use.
Still, it is quite possible that you'll at least consider new technology to support your program. There are many excellent technologies in this rapidly developing space, and, happily, vendors are being increasingly creative in how technology is delivered and partnering with customers to help reduce the overall cost of ownership. Cloud-based solutions are just one emerging example of this.
You also are likely using technologies that you either don't need or shouldn't be using. Sometimes these are “rogue” applications such as IM clients employees have downloaded and legacy systems no longer in use but still housing data. What you have remains to be seen, but it is there and you should get rid of it.
Conclusion
I have come to believe that people, process and technology are central components of the solution to just about every business problem, and records management is no exception. The success of your solution will depend on the attention you give to each of these components.
In my previous articles, I have talked about cleaning out unnecessary electronically stored information (ESI) and developing an effective records retention program. Now, I'd like to turn to execution. A records management policy and records retention schedule are worth little more than the bits and bytes they are made up of unless you actually implement them. And the key to successful implementation can be found in three simple letters—PPT: people, process and technology.
1. People
Yes, records management would be a whole lot easier if we could just eliminate the humans. But people are going to continue creating, saving, sending and deleting ESI for now, so the success of your records management program requires that you get them on board. People are important in two key respects: First, they have to understand the records management program and their responsibilities under it. Second, their role has to be as simple and undisruptive as is possible if you want them to comply.
Understanding and acceptance come through training. Formal training is important not only to help employees understand the records management program, but also because it reinforces the fact that the program is a priority. Employees should be trained when they are hired, whenever the program is significantly updated and on a periodic basis thereafter. If possible, the training should be interactive and include a testing component to increase the likelihood that information will be retained.
Compliance, however, requires more than simply understanding the program and its expectations. If the expectations are unreasonable, the result will be equally bad. Therefore, it will be important to simplify the process for individual custodians as much as possible by simplifying records classifications, reducing the number of decisions to be made and leveraging technology where possible.
2. Process
Before you can properly train people, you need to develop and document your processes. A policy provides overall direction. Schedules provide guidance for specific records. Process enables execution.
The records management process must include detailed procedures for how individual employees will execute the records management program as well as necessary reference materials. Among other things, you will need to have a file plan for unstructured data, including email. You will need to establish procedures for individual custodians to follow when categorizing records within your information systems. IT stewards of non-custodial data repositories also will require procedures for managing data in such systems.
The complete set of processes and procedures will be dependent on your business' information environment, and is far beyond the scope of this article, but it is a critical component of success. As I've mentioned before, don't let the sheer scope of the endeavor stop you from starting. Begin, if you need to, with a single information system, and move on from there.
3. Technology
I've said it before and I'll say it here again: technology is not a panacea. There is no easy button, so don't think you can dump records management onto the collective lap of IT and walk away. That being said, technology will be a critical, indispensible and unavoidable component of the program. The mantra for technology should be: Leverage what you have, acquire what you need, and retire or repurpose what you don't.
The technologies that we use each and every day (such as the email system that delivered you notification that this article had posted on InsideCounsel) are fabulous and have far more powerful records management capabilities than we tend to use.
Still, it is quite possible that you'll at least consider new technology to support your program. There are many excellent technologies in this rapidly developing space, and, happily, vendors are being increasingly creative in how technology is delivered and partnering with customers to help reduce the overall cost of ownership. Cloud-based solutions are just one emerging example of this.
You also are likely using technologies that you either don't need or shouldn't be using. Sometimes these are “rogue” applications such as IM clients employees have downloaded and legacy systems no longer in use but still housing data. What you have remains to be seen, but it is there and you should get rid of it.
Conclusion
I have come to believe that people, process and technology are central components of the solution to just about every business problem, and records management is no exception. The success of your solution will depend on the attention you give to each of these components.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
GCs Must Act Now to Prepare for the Trump Administration’s First Months
8 minute readEx-Six Flags CLO Lands New C-Suite Post—This Time as HR Chief
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250