Judge dismisses “The Hurt Locker” lawsuit
Its common for a movie watcher to identify with a film character. But its far different for someone to feel like he or she is a film character.
October 14, 2011 at 07:34 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's common for a movie watcher to identify with a film character. But it's far different for someone to feel like he or she is a film character.
When U.S. Army Sgt. Jeffrey Sarver saw “The Hurt Locker,” an award-winning film about an Army bomb squad in the Iraq War, he felt like he was watching his own life play out on screen. Sarver, who is a bomb-disposal expert, sued the filmmakers, claiming they used his likeness and personal experiences as the basis for one of the film's characters, Will James.
But yesterday, a district court judge found the similarities unconvincing and threw out Sarver's lawsuit. She also ordered him to pay the filmmakers' attorney's fees. According to Sarver's attorney, he plans to appeal.
Jeremiah Reynolds, a lawyer representing the screenwriter and director of “The Hurt Locker,” told Reuters the ruling was “a huge victory for all filmmakers who should feel comfortable using real life events as inspiration for their films. No artist should ever be forced to create entire fictional worlds that have no basis in reality simply because they fear the threat of meritless lawsuits.”
Screenwriter Mark Boal says “The Hurt Locker” is based on his experiences following a bomb-disposal unit in Iraq. According to Reuters, Boal says the Will James character is based on multiple people, and “for [Sarver] to claim that he was the hero of the movie definitely took something away from all the other guys that I talked to, guys that are contributing on a daily basis.”
It's common for a movie watcher to identify with a film character. But it's far different for someone to feel like he or she is a film character.
When U.S. Army Sgt. Jeffrey Sarver saw “The Hurt Locker,” an award-winning film about an Army bomb squad in the Iraq War, he felt like he was watching his own life play out on screen. Sarver, who is a bomb-disposal expert, sued the filmmakers, claiming they used his likeness and personal experiences as the basis for one of the film's characters, Will James.
But yesterday, a district court judge found the similarities unconvincing and threw out Sarver's lawsuit. She also ordered him to pay the filmmakers' attorney's fees. According to Sarver's attorney, he plans to appeal.
Jeremiah Reynolds, a lawyer representing the screenwriter and director of “The Hurt Locker,” told Reuters the ruling was “a huge victory for all filmmakers who should feel comfortable using real life events as inspiration for their films. No artist should ever be forced to create entire fictional worlds that have no basis in reality simply because they fear the threat of meritless lawsuits.”
Screenwriter Mark Boal says “The Hurt Locker” is based on his experiences following a bomb-disposal unit in Iraq. According to Reuters, Boal says the Will James character is based on multiple people, and “for [Sarver] to claim that he was the hero of the movie definitely took something away from all the other guys that I talked to, guys that are contributing on a daily basis.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1What Qualities Will Distinguish Good from Great Service In 2025?
- 2The Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
- 3Not Here: Court Finds Texas Has No Jurisdiction Over Google
- 4Lawyer's Retirement Benefits Excluded From Marital Property
- 5'David and Goliath' Dispute Between Software Developers Ends in $24M Settlement
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250