Investors request “shroud of secrecy” lifted in BofA’s $8.5 B settlement
Another page was written in the epic drama surrounding Bank of America Corp. and its seemingly endless legal trouble this year.A lawyer representing American International Group Inc. told U.S. District Court Judge William Pauley in New York Wednesday that investors want the shroud of secrecy lifted over the proposed $8.5...
November 04, 2011 at 07:43 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Another page was written in the epic drama surrounding Bank of America Corp. (BofA) and its seemingly endless legal trouble this year.
A lawyer representing American International Group Inc. (AIG) told U.S. District Court Judge William Pauley in New York Wednesday that investors want the “shroud of secrecy” lifted over the proposed $8.5 billion settlement of BofA's mortgage-backed securities liability stemming from bad loans sold by Countrywide Financial Corp., which BofA bought in 2008.
“We want to come back to you and ask you to find it's not confidential,” Dan Reilly, a partner at Denver-based Reilly Pozner, said to Judge Pauley, according to a Reuters report. He claimed that Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BNY Mellon), which is acting as the trustee for the myriad pools of mortgage-backed securities covered in the settlement, previously had asked Judge Pauley to withhold substantive rulings until an appeal was heard. “A shroud of secrecy is being pushed back by asking you not to rule on anything,” Reilly added.
However, Reuters reports that BNY Mellon said the negotiations leading to the proposed agreement were hardly as secretive as some investors seem to think.
On Oct. 19, Judge Pauley ruled the case belonged in federal court. BNY Mellon is seeking to appeal that decision.
“The settlement agreement at issue here implicates core federal interests in the integrity of nationally chartered banks and the vitality of the national securities markets,” Judge Pauley said in his decision at the time. “A controversy touching on these paramount federal interests should proceed in federal court.”
Twenty-two major investors approved the settlement but, in September, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman claimed other investors affected by the settlement were excluded from the decision. AIG is one investor that has criticized the agreement and sued BofA on its own.
For more, read Reuters.
Another page was written in the epic drama surrounding
A lawyer representing
“We want to come back to you and ask you to find it's not confidential,” Dan Reilly, a partner at Denver-based
However, Reuters reports that BNY Mellon said the negotiations leading to the proposed agreement were hardly as secretive as some investors seem to think.
On Oct. 19, Judge Pauley ruled the case belonged in federal court. BNY Mellon is seeking to appeal that decision.
“The settlement agreement at issue here implicates core federal interests in the integrity of nationally chartered banks and the vitality of the national securities markets,” Judge Pauley said in his decision at the time. “A controversy touching on these paramount federal interests should proceed in federal court.”
Twenty-two major investors approved the settlement but, in September,
For more, read Reuters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Zero-Dollar Verdict: Which of Florida's Largest Firms Lost?
- 2Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
- 3SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
- 4Judiciary Law §487 in 2024
- 5Polsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250