Alcoa corruption case reopened
Yesterday a federal judge reopened a racketeering case against Alcoa Inc., the U.S.s largest aluminum producer, so that the company can have a chance to clear its name.
November 14, 2011 at 07:15 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Yesterday a federal judge reopened a racketeering case against Alcoa Inc., the U.S.'s largest aluminum producer, so that the company can have a chance to clear its name.
In February 2008, Bahrain's state-owned aluminum company, Aluminium Bahrain BSC, commonly called Alba, sued Alcoa, claiming the American company had paid kickbacks to Bahraini officials after it had overcharged Alba by hundreds of millions of dollars for alumina, a raw material that is used to make aluminum. A month after Alba filed its suit, U.S. District Judge Donetta Ambrose stayed the case because the Department of Justice (DOJ) began a criminal investigation to find out whether Alcoa violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which prohibits bribing foreign officials.
According to Businessweek, in late Alcoa October asked Judge Ambrose to reopen the federal case so that it could seek dismissal, claiming racketeering law doesn't apply to the extraterritorial conduct Alba is alleging. But days later, the DOJ asked Judge Ambrose to allow it to continue its FCPA investigation of Alcoa for at least six more months.
Alcoa was pleased yesterday when Judge Ambrose ordered Alba to file an amended complaint within 20 days, as well as a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statement laying out its racketeering case 30 days after that. Alcoa will then be able to file its motion to dismiss the case.
“After three-and-a-half years we can have our day in court,” Alcoa Spokesperson Lori Lecker said in an email to Businessweek. “We look forward to filing our motion to dismiss.”
Yesterday a federal judge reopened a racketeering case against
In February 2008, Bahrain's state-owned aluminum company, Aluminium Bahrain BSC, commonly called Alba, sued Alcoa, claiming the American company had paid kickbacks to Bahraini officials after it had overcharged Alba by hundreds of millions of dollars for alumina, a raw material that is used to make aluminum. A month after Alba filed its suit, U.S. District Judge Donetta Ambrose stayed the case because the Department of Justice (DOJ) began a criminal investigation to find out whether Alcoa violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which prohibits bribing foreign officials.
According to Businessweek, in late Alcoa October asked Judge Ambrose to reopen the federal case so that it could seek dismissal, claiming racketeering law doesn't apply to the extraterritorial conduct Alba is alleging. But days later, the DOJ asked Judge Ambrose to allow it to continue its FCPA investigation of Alcoa for at least six more months.
Alcoa was pleased yesterday when Judge Ambrose ordered Alba to file an amended complaint within 20 days, as well as a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statement laying out its racketeering case 30 days after that. Alcoa will then be able to file its motion to dismiss the case.
“After three-and-a-half years we can have our day in court,” Alcoa Spokesperson Lori Lecker said in an email to Businessweek. “We look forward to filing our motion to dismiss.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute read
Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1The Importance of Contractual Language in Analyzing Post-Closing Earnout Disputes
- 2People in the News—Jan. 8, 2025—Stevens & Lee, Ogletree Deakins
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Avoid Getting Stuck in a Moment,' Says Federico Cuadra Del Carmen of Baker McKenzie
- 4Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
- 5Spalding Jurors Return $12M Verdict Against State Farm Insurance Client
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
