Man says he was fired for refusing to wear “666” sticker at work
While the Book of Revelations may have put the words into widespread circulation and became gospel for many devout Christians, for others, they just conjure up hazy images of rocking out to Iron Maiden in the 80s while drunk and/or stoned in their parents basement.
November 23, 2011 at 07:02 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
“Let him who hath understanding reckon the number of the beast, for it is a human number—its number is six hundred and sixty-six.”
While the Book of Revelations may have put the words into widespread circulation and became gospel for many devout Christians, for others, they just conjure up hazy images of rocking out to Iron Maiden in the '80s while drunk and/or stoned in their parents' basement.
A Georgia man, however, apparently falls in the former category, as he's filed a federal lawsuit against his former employer for firing him after he refused to wear an unholy number.
Billy Hyatt, a self-proclaimed pious Christian, asserts Pliant Corp. (now known as Berry Plastics Corp.) unfairly terminated him in 2009 when he declined to wear a sticker declaring the company had been accident-free for 666 days. The company issued stickers to its employees daily to celebrate its safe work environment.
Yet Hyatt's nervousness grew over time as the number steadily rose during his tenure at the company into the 600s. Fearing that he'd have to wear the sticker, he proactively asked his manager for permission to not wear the sticker, and allegedly was told he would not have to. He also reportedly requested that he be allowed to take a vacation day on the day celebrating the company's 666th accident-free day.
But when the fateful day finally came on March 12, 2009, Hyatt approached his manager to revisit his request to not wear the sticker, and reportedly was told his beliefs were “ridiculous,” and that he had a choice either to wear the sticker or accept a three-day suspension.
“The people that accept the mark, they're going to burn in hell,” Hyatt said in a WSB-TV Atlanta interview. “There's no way that I'm going to put that on my body.”
Hyatt accepted the suspension and was terminated days later at a human resources meeting. Following the firing, Hyatt filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Hyatt's pending lawsuit seeks punitive damages and back pay.
“666—the number of the beast. Sacrifice is going on tonight.” Unfortunately, Hyatt likely won't take solace in Steve Harris' seemingly now-ironic lyrics.
Watch Hyatt's WSB-TV interview.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250