NLRB to vote on “Quickie Election” rule
As the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) prepares to lose one of its three members at the end of the year, it appears to be scrambling to vote on a set of proposed amendments to union election procedures.
November 23, 2011 at 05:48 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
As the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) prepares to lose one of its three members at the end of the year, it appears to be scrambling to vote on a set of proposed amendments to union election procedures.
The board announced last week that it will vote on the so-called “Quickie Election” rule Nov. 30, just about a month before board member Craig Becker's term expires on Dec. 31. The board's proposed rule, which it published in June, would shorten union representation elections to about 30 days as opposed to the current 56 days. Experts say the shorter time frame would make it more likely that unions win elections, which is disconcerting to employers.
The proposed rule also includes the following significant changes to the current union election process:
- Accelerating the initial hearing date following the filing of a representation petition
- Mandating expansive pre-hearing discovery of issues
- Significantly curtailing the ability to litigate issues before an election
- Eliminating the right to file post-hearing briefs
- Barring pre-election requests to review regional decisions
- Requiring lists of eligible voters be filed within only two days
- Providing unions with voters' phone numbers and email addresses
According to a NLRB press release, the Nov. 30 meeting “will be open to the public, although the public may not participate.” The agency did not, however, specify which proposed amendments it will be considering at the meeting.
Read more about the upcoming vote on Jackson Lewis' website.
As the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) prepares to lose one of its three members at the end of the year, it appears to be scrambling to vote on a set of proposed amendments to union election procedures.
The board announced last week that it will vote on the so-called “Quickie Election” rule Nov. 30, just about a month before board member Craig Becker's term expires on Dec. 31. The board's proposed rule, which it published in June, would shorten union representation elections to about 30 days as opposed to the current 56 days. Experts say the shorter time frame would make it more likely that unions win elections, which is disconcerting to employers.
The proposed rule also includes the following significant changes to the current union election process:
- Accelerating the initial hearing date following the filing of a representation petition
- Mandating expansive pre-hearing discovery of issues
- Significantly curtailing the ability to litigate issues before an election
- Eliminating the right to file post-hearing briefs
- Barring pre-election requests to review regional decisions
- Requiring lists of eligible voters be filed within only two days
- Providing unions with voters' phone numbers and email addresses
According to a NLRB press release, the Nov. 30 meeting “will be open to the public, although the public may not participate.” The agency did not, however, specify which proposed amendments it will be considering at the meeting.
Read more about the upcoming vote on
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
4 minute readWhite Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
DLA Piper Adds Former Verizon GC Amid In-House Hiring Spree
Trending Stories
- 1The Importance of Contractual Language in Analyzing Post-Closing Earnout Disputes
- 2People in the News—Jan. 8, 2025—Stevens & Lee, Ogletree Deakins
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Avoid Getting Stuck in a Moment,' Says Federico Cuadra Del Carmen of Baker McKenzie
- 4Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
- 5Spalding Jurors Return $12M Verdict Against State Farm Insurance Client
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250