Major law firms announce year-end bonuses
Its the holidays, and that means its that time of year when law firms are doling out their annual bonuses. But despite the fact that law firms made more money in 2011 than they did in 2010, this years bonuses are nearly identical to the previous two years amounts.
December 09, 2011 at 05:41 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's the holidays, and that means it's that time of year when law firms are doling out their annual bonuses. But despite the fact that law firms made more money in 2011 than they did in 2010, this year's bonuses are nearly identical to the previous two years' amounts.
On Nov. 28, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, which traditionally has set the benchmark for the bonuses that other firms give to their lawyers, announced its 2011 year-end bonuses. The Wall Street Journal Law Blog reported that Cravath's first-year associates will receive $7,500, while seventh-year associates will receive $37,500. Shortly after the announcement, Skadden, Milbank, Proskauer Rose and other top firms announced similar bonus amounts.
But Thomson Reuters reports that a September Wells Fargo Wealth Management survey revealed that law firms made more money this year than they did in 2010, with profits per partner rising 7.6 percent for the first half of the year at 125 of the country's top firms. Revenue also increased 4.5 percent.
Experts say the stagnant bonuses are a sign of image-awareness among law firms. With Occupy protesters across the country assailing greed and many clients still reeling from economic troubles, firms are hesitant to dispense huge bonuses to attorneys.
Nonetheless, in-house lawyers saw bigger bonuses last year. HBR Consulting's 2010 law department salary survey indicated that in-house bonuses jumped an average of 73.5 percent between 2009 and 2010. The increase brought bonuses back to pre-recession levels.
Read about 2011 in-house compensation and job trends, including news about salaries and bonuses, in the February 2012 issue of InsideCounsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Beyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
