Law firms not yet taking full advantage of social media
Be sure to tweet, like, digg, send and share this news with everyone in your Google+ circles.
December 13, 2011 at 07:11 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Be sure to tweet, like, digg, send and share this news with everyone in your Google+ circles.
A survey released yesterday by LexisNexis and Martindale-Hubbell examining law firms' social media usage finds that while all of them are perhaps painfully aware of social media at this point—and are using it—the extent to which they're delving into its deepest depths is relatively nonexistent.
Specifically, the study examined 110 global law firms' usage of Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, blogs and other social media channels from April to mid-May 2011. The firms, operating in 22 major cities in seven regions spanning the globe, were audited on both quantitative and qualitative levels to measure activity and engagement levels as well as macro and micro trends for each firm's activity in a given social media channel.
According to the findings, 77 percent of law firms are using at least one or more social network. Drilling deeper, 85 of the 110 firms have a LinkedIn network, but from there, the numbers drop precipitously for other channels—Twitter (35), Facebook (32), YouTube (12) and blogs (9).
Of the 85 law firms that are on LinkedIn, just 27 own a group and just nine have somewhat serious member engagement.
“LinkedIn emerged as the primary non-sector-specific platform used by the law firms audited … Yet, while many law firms have created 'company' profiles, a much smaller percentage are taking advantage of some of the more advanced features of virtual networking, such as groups or LinkedIn Answers,” the survey notes.
Of the 35 firms using Twitter, just 24 broadcast news and only three have much follower interaction.
“At present, Twitter is mainly used as a broadcasting channel, rather than as a tool to hold conversations with the firm's followers,” the survey finds. “At present, only a small percentage of firms studied use Twitter interactively.”
And as for Facebook engagement levels, of the firms on Facebook, 12 have 10 to 100 fans, 10 have 100 to 1,000 fans and only one has more than 1,000 fans.
The numbers, however, get worse for other forms of social media.
“YouTube remains largely unexplored as a platform by law firms,” the study says. “This lack of usage was seen across all world regions—even in cities where adoption of social media tools was comparatively high, such as in New York, Johannesburg and London. Amsterdam-based firms stood out as YouTube enthusiasts, with three audited law practices in this city actively using this platform for graduate recruitment, thought leadership and promotional marketing.”
Broken down by region, North American law firms are embracing social media more than firms in other regions, with 19 of the 20 North American firms surveyed having a LinkedIn presence, 14 on Twitter and 11 on Facebook. Asia Pacific and Europe followed somewhat closely behind with LinkedIn, but dropped off dramatically when compared on Twitter and Facebook usage.
The survey went on to note that just 7 percent of law firms are blogging, and of those that do, the firms with the most robust efforts are located in Sydney, Johannesburg and Brussels.
To read the full survey results, visit Martindale-Hubbell's website.
For more analysis, read the Wall Street Journal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readFTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250