Litigation: The year in review
In keeping with the spirit of the holidays, its time to reflect on 2011 and think about ways to improve in the year to come.
December 15, 2011 at 05:49 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In keeping with the spirit of the holidays, it's time to reflect on 2011 and think about ways to improve in the year to come. As the adage goes, those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it, and looking back, there's much both to be grateful for and to learn from. Legally speaking, reviewing a year of seminal cases, legislation and events is the best way to forecast next year for inside and outside counsel alike. To maintain a holiday tradition of sorts, for my end-of-year column here are a few takeaways from 2011 and tips for 2012, using this past year's columns as a guide.
Deck the halls with SEC enforcement actions. In the post Dodd-Frank world, the SEC has enthusiastically brought actions against big and small violations at an unprecedented rate. Earlier this year, in “Broker-Dealers Beware,” I wrote about the SEC's push for a uniform fiduciary standard for brokers, dealers and investment advisers when providing personalized investment advice to customers.
Predictably, there isn't a resolution on the appropriate standard. But the SEC's commitment to protect investors saw it commit to a more aggressive pursuit of alleged violators. The SEC had a record year, filing more enforcement actions than ever before. In the year to come, it is important for both inside and outside counsel to be aware of this increased vigilance.
Checking it twice. In “How the 2nd Circuit opened the door to double recovery,” I warned that spurned investors may now have a vehicle to recover twice—through a class action or tangentially related suit and then again via FINRA-mandated arbitration. For in-house counsel and their companies it is important to know that the end is just that—the end.
Complete relief and finality is the goal and the increasing use of this method for double recovery is something to keep in mind. In-house counsel should be aware of investors' repeated attempts to recover their losses using a different adjudicator or with different claims. An onus must be placed on careful crafting of settlement agreements.
Look for change. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) continued to make its way into the headlines this year. In “Who is a foreign official under the FCPA,” I noted that courts were broadly defining the term “foreign official” under the FCPA and that U.S. v. Noriega was the tip of the iceberg for the Department of Justice (DOJ). And it was. In 2010 and 2011, FCPA actions by the DOJ doubled. In 2012, look for companies to push back.
Last week, the New York City Bar Association issued a report to the government calling for changes to the FCPA, citing its disproportionate burdens on U.S. regulated companies. Take the opportunity in 2012 to push back yourself by writing to the government and voicing your concerns.
Be the change. I recently spoke to a group of first-year associates on the importance of doing pro bono work. Some were eager to get involved but weren't sure how, some were worried about time commitments and others didn't know what type of case they wanted to accept. Whatever the reasons are, it's important to overcome that fear and dive in. I always enjoy urging new attorneys to embrace pro bono work, but it shouldn't stop with young lawyers—it extends to all of us. For inside counsel, if you're able, consider partnering with your outside law firms and asking about involvement in their pro bono programs.
I wish all of you a happy and healthy holiday season and New Year. It's been a pleasure writing this column in 2011. Thanks to all of you for reading it.
In keeping with the spirit of the holidays, it's time to reflect on 2011 and think about ways to improve in the year to come. As the adage goes, those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it, and looking back, there's much both to be grateful for and to learn from. Legally speaking, reviewing a year of seminal cases, legislation and events is the best way to forecast next year for inside and outside counsel alike. To maintain a holiday tradition of sorts, for my end-of-year column here are a few takeaways from 2011 and tips for 2012, using this past year's columns as a guide.
Deck the halls with SEC enforcement actions. In the post Dodd-Frank world, the SEC has enthusiastically brought actions against big and small violations at an unprecedented rate. Earlier this year, in “Broker-Dealers Beware,” I wrote about the SEC's push for a uniform fiduciary standard for brokers, dealers and investment advisers when providing personalized investment advice to customers.
Predictably, there isn't a resolution on the appropriate standard. But the SEC's commitment to protect investors saw it commit to a more aggressive pursuit of alleged violators. The SEC had a record year, filing more enforcement actions than ever before. In the year to come, it is important for both inside and outside counsel to be aware of this increased vigilance.
Checking it twice. In “How the 2nd Circuit opened the door to double recovery,” I warned that spurned investors may now have a vehicle to recover twice—through a class action or tangentially related suit and then again via FINRA-mandated arbitration. For in-house counsel and their companies it is important to know that the end is just that—the end.
Complete relief and finality is the goal and the increasing use of this method for double recovery is something to keep in mind. In-house counsel should be aware of investors' repeated attempts to recover their losses using a different adjudicator or with different claims. An onus must be placed on careful crafting of settlement agreements.
Look for change. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) continued to make its way into the headlines this year. In “Who is a foreign official under the FCPA,” I noted that courts were broadly defining the term “foreign official” under the FCPA and that U.S. v. Noriega was the tip of the iceberg for the Department of Justice (DOJ). And it was. In 2010 and 2011, FCPA actions by the DOJ doubled. In 2012, look for companies to push back.
Last week, the
Be the change. I recently spoke to a group of first-year associates on the importance of doing pro bono work. Some were eager to get involved but weren't sure how, some were worried about time commitments and others didn't know what type of case they wanted to accept. Whatever the reasons are, it's important to overcome that fear and dive in. I always enjoy urging new attorneys to embrace pro bono work, but it shouldn't stop with young lawyers—it extends to all of us. For inside counsel, if you're able, consider partnering with your outside law firms and asking about involvement in their pro bono programs.
I wish all of you a happy and healthy holiday season and New Year. It's been a pleasure writing this column in 2011. Thanks to all of you for reading it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readIn-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250