Replacement counsel sought in New York foreclosure cases
Its great to relax and have fun with colleagues at corporate holiday parties. But one group of employees took the fun too far at their 2010 Halloween party, and they now are suffering the consequences of their inappropriate behavior.
December 19, 2011 at 07:09 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's great to relax and have fun with colleagues at corporate holiday parties. But one group of employees took the “fun” too far at their 2010 Halloween party, and they now are suffering the consequences of their inappropriate behavior.
Last year, employees at the Amherst, N.Y.-based law firm Steven J. Baum, which represented banks and mortgage servicers in about 40 percent of New York's foreclosure actions in 2010, hosted a foreclosure-themed Halloween party, at which employees dressed as homeless people. The New York Times posted photos of the party, which a former Baum employee submitted because she thought readers should know about the firm's callous attitude toward consumers whose homes were being foreclosed.
In November, the firm announced that it planned to close. The announcement came after months of federal and state investigations as to whether Baum incorrectly handled its foreclosure cases. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac also had recently barred loan servicers from referring new foreclosure cases to Baum when the firm announced its closure.
On Friday, New York Financial Services Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky said mortgage servicers must “proceed expeditiously” to find replacement counsel for Baum's foreclosure cases in order to prevent long delays that could result in penalties or fees that would become a financial burden to consumers.
“New Yorkers facing foreclosures should not be penalized in any way because of delays which may arise because many mortgage servicers will now need to find new counsel,” Lawsky said in a statement. “It adds insult to injury for New Yorkers to suffer further as a result of shuttering this abusive and discredited firm.”
Read Thomson Reuters for more information about the Baum foreclosure scandal.
It's great to relax and have fun with colleagues at corporate holiday parties. But one group of employees took the “fun” too far at their 2010 Halloween party, and they now are suffering the consequences of their inappropriate behavior.
Last year, employees at the Amherst, N.Y.-based law firm Steven J. Baum, which represented banks and mortgage servicers in about 40 percent of
In November, the firm announced that it planned to close. The announcement came after months of federal and state investigations as to whether Baum incorrectly handled its foreclosure cases.
On Friday,
“New Yorkers facing foreclosures should not be penalized in any way because of delays which may arise because many mortgage servicers will now need to find new counsel,” Lawsky said in a statement. “It adds insult to injury for New Yorkers to suffer further as a result of shuttering this abusive and discredited firm.”
Read Thomson Reuters for more information about the Baum foreclosure scandal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBest Practices for Adopting and Adapting to AI: Mitigating Risk in Light of Increasing Regulatory and Shareholder Scrutiny
7 minute readCrypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
US Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250