Wells Fargo investigated for possible data breach
Nothing says Happy New Year! like an investigation from the attorney general. Such is the reality for Wells Fargo & Co., which now must explain to Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen why it may have disclosed customers Social Security numbers when it mailed them copies of subpoenas issued by the...
January 05, 2012 at 06:43 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Nothing says “Happy New Year!” like an investigation from the attorney general. Such is the reality for Wells Fargo & Co., which now must explain to Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen why it may have disclosed customers' Social Security numbers when it mailed them copies of subpoenas issued by the state Department of Social Services (DSS) as part of a fraud investigation.
The potential breach is just part of a larger probe by the Connecticut DSS into whether state employees falsified financial information for food benefits issued in the wake of Hurricane Irene in August 2011. Improper disclosure of Social Security numbers by individuals or entities without redaction is a violation of state law.
“My initial review suggests that neither Connecticut nor federal law required Wells to disclose DSS's subpoenas to the customers whose records were sought therein,” Jepsen wrote in a letter to James Strother, Wells Fargo's senior executive vice president and general counsel. “Nor am I aware of any reason to conclude that Wells was prohibited from redacting other individuals' information from subpoenas it chose to disclose to customers.”
The AG's office reports that 130 Social Security numbers, along with identifying information, were included on at least two subpoenas issued to Wells Fargo. The financial services firm purportedly then passed on copies of the subpoenas to its customers without redacting any of that personal information.
Jepsen also requested in the letter, dated Jan. 4, that Wells Fargo respond by next week.
“It is vital that you provide further information to my office concerning this matter so that I may determine the appropriateness of Wells' conduct and whether Wells must provide affected individuals with protections against identity theft or other harms,” Jepsen wrote.
If a breach did occur, Jepsen wrote that he would ask the company to provide credit monitoring, identity theft insurance and security freeze reimbursement to the affected customers.
A Wells Fargo spokesman told Reuters that its “focus is on its customers and other individuals who were affected,” and that it will offer them the option of signing up for identity theft protection.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anticompetitive Practices, Fees
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250