2011 a “transformative year” for workplace class action litigation
Theres no doubt about it: 2011 was a big year for class action litigation. Experts say a number of last years trends and cases are likely to shape the litigation landscape in 2012, particularly within the workplace class action arena.
January 10, 2012 at 06:25 AM
10 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
There's no doubt about it: 2011 was a big year for class action litigation. Experts say a number of last year's trends and cases are likely to shape the litigation landscape in 2012, particularly within the workplace class action arena.
Seyfarth Shaw recently released its eighth annual Workplace Class Action Litigation Report, which analyzes nearly 1,000 rulings and major settlements from 2011. The report notes that a number of factors—including the economy, an increasingly aggressive plaintiffs bar, revamped state and federal enforcement regimes, and major Supreme Court rulings—will impact labor and employment litigation this year and in years to come.
One major 2011 Supreme Court ruling has already made a big impression on class action litigation. Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., which established a new standard for certifying class actions, has already been cited more than 260 times in federal and state court opinions. Experts say that although Dukes was perceived as a win for employers, the momentous decision sparked the plaintiffs bar to refocus its litigation strategy, which could lead to more litigation.
“One of the inevitable consequences of Dukes is not a decrease in the number of workplace class actions, but a likely increase—the wrinkle being that the new difficulty in achieving nationwide certification is forcing the plaintiffs' class action bar into seeking multiple state or perhaps regional class cases to improve the chances of certification,” says Seyfarth Shaw Partner Gerald Maatman Jr.
The report also found that wage and hour filings are outnumbering all other workplace class actions, with Fair Labor Standards Act actions leading the way. The shaky economy also is spurring Employee Retirement Income Security Act class actions seeking the recovery of 401(k) losses.
Furthermore, the report notes that the government is expanding its involvement in workplace litigation. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which saw increased funding in 2011, is litigating larger pattern litigation, while the Department of Labor is increasing its oversight of industries that have frequent workplace regulation violations.
Click here to view Seyfarth Shaw's Workplace Class Action Litigation Report.
There's no doubt about it: 2011 was a big year for class action litigation. Experts say a number of last year's trends and cases are likely to shape the litigation landscape in 2012, particularly within the workplace class action arena.
One major 2011 Supreme Court ruling has already made a big impression on class action litigation. Dukes v.
“One of the inevitable consequences of Dukes is not a decrease in the number of workplace class actions, but a likely increase—the wrinkle being that the new difficulty in achieving nationwide certification is forcing the plaintiffs' class action bar into seeking multiple state or perhaps regional class cases to improve the chances of certification,” says
The report also found that wage and hour filings are outnumbering all other workplace class actions, with Fair Labor Standards Act actions leading the way. The shaky economy also is spurring Employee Retirement Income Security Act class actions seeking the recovery of 401(k) losses.
Furthermore, the report notes that the government is expanding its involvement in workplace litigation. The
Click here to view
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250