The top 5 e-discovery trends for 2012
When it comes to e-discovery best practices, if your organization is standing still, you are losing ground.
January 13, 2012 at 04:30 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
When it comes to e-discovery best practices, if your organization is standing still, you are losing ground. Law firm lawyers, corporate counsel, litigation support professionals and IT staff face a vicious cycle of looking for technology and processes to help them stay ahead of the curve.
As we head into 2012, there is no better time to take stock of the ever-shifting e-discovery landscape and predict the top trends for the New Year.
5. FRCP amendment dialogue will continue to sputter along. In the last 12 months, discussions regarding possible amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) picked up speed, with the Discovery Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules holding mini-conferences and issuing calls for comment in 2011. The primary issues debated were preservation and sanctions. While consensus around the need for rule amendments is still building, we will not likely see any massive change in the near term. If the past is any indication of the future—with the 2006 amendments taking more than five years to formulate and promulgate—it may be 2015 before we see official revisions to the FRCP. If you want to stay up to speed, monitor the U.S. Courts website.
4. Social media and e-discovery will continue to grow friendlier. We are increasingly turning to social networking sites to conduct our day-to-day personal and professional communications, outpacing other mediums such as text messaging and e-mail. While friending and tweeting may provide users with innumerable benefits, these new platforms bring nothing but ESI headaches for legal professionals.
Several salient 2011 social media opinions exemplify that courts, experts, litigators and commentators have surpassed the simple notion that “social media is discoverable” and have fixated on the next step—grappling with the intricacies of social media discovery head-on. Watch for e-discovery best practices to continue to advance in 2012, with solution providers bringing innovative social media collection and preservation tools to the market and judges issuing more intricate opinions on the discoverability of this new source of ESI.
3. One platform for the entire Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) will emerge. Most organizations know all too well the pains of jockeying data between multitudes of “point-solutions” to move ESI through the various stages of the EDRM. Data and tool jockeying not only drive up the costs associated with purchasing and supporting numerous e-discovery platforms, but more importantly, there is increased risk in “piecemealing” platforms from diverse providers that were not designed to work together seamlessly. In the next 12 to 18 months, look for compelling, integrated platforms that can manage most or all of the e-discovery lifecycle.
In addition, this movement toward a single EDRM toolset will also reduce the heightened challenges associated with global e-discovery, with fewer chances for error when handling multilingual data in a single platform. Just remember, the magic box does not guarantee success without the proper processes being built around it.
2. Cloud computing will look less stormy. There is little argument that cloud computing and software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms have created a paradigm shift in enterprise technology and IT as a whole. With more e-discovery options now than ever before, organizations will need to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of the various technology platforms.
How will cloud or SaaS applications fit in? Based on a 2011 Kroll Ontrack DIY Trends survey, law firms and corporations are considering cloud and SaaS-based tools more than ever before, with more than 80 percent of organizations and law firms planning to leverage the cloud for e-discovery and information management in the next two years. While evaluating the security and scalability of such platforms will be critical prior to adoption, organizations must become nimble in order to adapt to the changing e-discovery environment, and considering a switch to a cloud-based discovery platform may just give them the flexibility and cost savings they need to succeed.
1. Technology assisted review will blast off. Technology assisted review? Intelligent review? Predictive coding? Smart review? Whatever you call it, amidst growing data volumes and dwindling resources, traditional linear document review is quickly going the way of the dinosaur. In 2011, many organizations experimented with intelligent review technology, looking for ways to integrate these innovative solutions into their tried-and-true review protocols.
In 2012, watch for increased adoption, with compelling case studies emerging, proving increased efficiencies without compromised quality or defensibility. Plus, perhaps 2012 will bring the first official judicial endorsement of this technology in a published judicial opinion, complimenting the judicial commentary at conferences and in articles that we saw in 2011.
2012 will be the year of new perspectives, with corporations getting a better handle on managing e-discovery as a compliance, risk and governance process—and in some cases creating new best practices. Further, in the coming year, we will continue to see developments in both the law and technology, with each spurring the other to constantly innovate and advance.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
AT&T General Counsel Joins ADM Board as Company Reels From Accounting Scandal
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250