Technology: How much does your business rely on the Internet?
Broad reliance on the Internet means that unsound policies have the power to harm every organization
January 27, 2012 at 12:54 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In the two short decades since it became available for commercial use, the Internet has come to occupy a unique position in the business world. Novelty has quickly given way to an unthinking reliance. Like electricity and running water, the Internet is presumed to be available on roughly the same terms in the future as it is today.
Unthinking reliance invites unanticipated risks. More thought should be given to how deeply the Internet is embedded in an organization's business plan, and to the Internet policies on which that plan relies.
In determining how deeply the Internet is embedded in a business or strategic plan, it may help to ask some probing questions. How would the sudden loss of email affect communications within your organization and with customers, suppliers and distributors? What would an interruption in such communications cost your organization? How would the disappearance of your website(s) affect marketing? How would the unavailability of the web affect research (including legal research) and other essential operations?
Such questions should prompt a searching reappraisal of the take-it-for-granted approach that many organizations understandably fall into. One of the Internet's chief virtues is that it just works. But behind its rugged exterior lie a few facts that every counsel should know:
- The Internet functions as a global network because of unified technical standards and policies
- Those standards and policies, which affect the functionality of email and the web alike, are primarily decided and administered by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
- ICANN invites all stakeholders—governments, businesses, NGOs, and individuals—to participate in the formation of such standards and policies
In short, the standards and policies that shape how the Internet operates, what features it offers, how domain name disputes are decided, and what business opportunities on the Internet open up or terminate are subject to policy debates that occur beyond the horizon for many organizations.
Last year alone, ICANN approved the introduction of a new Top Level Domain (TLD) for pornography (.xxx) and a program to add a limitless variety of new TLDs. Already these decisions have shifted and disrupted business plans. But these are hardly the only policy decisions within ICANN's power that present threats and opportunities:
- Many businesses rely on the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, an out-of-court procedure for resolving domain names. Less well known is that the policy will come up for a thoroughgoing review after the first new TLDs go live next year.
- Cybersquatting victims and law enforcement officials rely on ICANN's WHOIS policies that require Internet domain registrants to disclose certain information and registrars to maintain that information in a publicly accessible database. A community review team has determined that those policies are ineffective and badly enforced. If adopted, its recommendations would enhance the enforcement of domain name abuse policies of all kinds.
Internet policy presents business risk. And perhaps the most dangerous risk of all is the international conflict over ICANN's authority. Its multi-stakeholder model of governance that welcomes every stakeholder to contribute to the development or modification of Internet policies is opposed by China, Russia and their allies who are openly clamoring for governments to have exclusive decision-making power over Internet policy. If they prevail, businesses will have little say in establishing Internet policies that affect them.
Internet policy affects every organization—not just those in Silicon Valley. McKinsey recently published a groundbreaking report finding that 75 percent of the economic value produced by the Internet benefits traditional industries, not Internet-based enterprises. Broad reliance on the Internet means that unsound policies have the power to harm every sector of the economy.
With the risks and opportunities that the Internet presents, there never has been a more important time to incorporate Internet policies into your business and strategic plans.
In the two short decades since it became available for commercial use, the Internet has come to occupy a unique position in the business world. Novelty has quickly given way to an unthinking reliance. Like electricity and running water, the Internet is presumed to be available on roughly the same terms in the future as it is today.
Unthinking reliance invites unanticipated risks. More thought should be given to how deeply the Internet is embedded in an organization's business plan, and to the Internet policies on which that plan relies.
In determining how deeply the Internet is embedded in a business or strategic plan, it may help to ask some probing questions. How would the sudden loss of email affect communications within your organization and with customers, suppliers and distributors? What would an interruption in such communications cost your organization? How would the disappearance of your website(s) affect marketing? How would the unavailability of the web affect research (including legal research) and other essential operations?
Such questions should prompt a searching reappraisal of the take-it-for-granted approach that many organizations understandably fall into. One of the Internet's chief virtues is that it just works. But behind its rugged exterior lie a few facts that every counsel should know:
- The Internet functions as a global network because of unified technical standards and policies
- Those standards and policies, which affect the functionality of email and the web alike, are primarily decided and administered by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
- ICANN invites all stakeholders—governments, businesses, NGOs, and individuals—to participate in the formation of such standards and policies
In short, the standards and policies that shape how the Internet operates, what features it offers, how domain name disputes are decided, and what business opportunities on the Internet open up or terminate are subject to policy debates that occur beyond the horizon for many organizations.
Last year alone, ICANN approved the introduction of a new Top Level Domain (TLD) for pornography (.xxx) and a program to add a limitless variety of new TLDs. Already these decisions have shifted and disrupted business plans. But these are hardly the only policy decisions within ICANN's power that present threats and opportunities:
- Many businesses rely on the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, an out-of-court procedure for resolving domain names. Less well known is that the policy will come up for a thoroughgoing review after the first new TLDs go live next year.
- Cybersquatting victims and law enforcement officials rely on ICANN's WHOIS policies that require Internet domain registrants to disclose certain information and registrars to maintain that information in a publicly accessible database. A community review team has determined that those policies are ineffective and badly enforced. If adopted, its recommendations would enhance the enforcement of domain name abuse policies of all kinds.
Internet policy presents business risk. And perhaps the most dangerous risk of all is the international conflict over ICANN's authority. Its multi-stakeholder model of governance that welcomes every stakeholder to contribute to the development or modification of Internet policies is opposed by China, Russia and their allies who are openly clamoring for governments to have exclusive decision-making power over Internet policy. If they prevail, businesses will have little say in establishing Internet policies that affect them.
Internet policy affects every organization—not just those in Silicon Valley. McKinsey recently published a groundbreaking report finding that 75 percent of the economic value produced by the Internet benefits traditional industries, not Internet-based enterprises. Broad reliance on the Internet means that unsound policies have the power to harm every sector of the economy.
With the risks and opportunities that the Internet presents, there never has been a more important time to incorporate Internet policies into your business and strategic plans.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250