How to deal with data stuck in the cloud
Companies are increasingly embracing cloud computing, storing their email, files and other electronic information in a cloud storage service providers data center accessible via the Internet.
February 06, 2012 at 04:45 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Companies are increasingly embracing cloud computing, storing their email, files and other electronic information in a cloud storage service provider's data center accessible via the Internet. While cloud computing can make the IT organization's life easier, the lack of effective information governance controls in the cloud foretell a coming crisis.
Cloud computing is the hot, new trend in IT because it reduces capital expenditures, is charged “per the drink” based on the amount of data stored and releases the IT staff from the headaches of securing and backing up data. The cloud computing market is expected to reach $150 billion by next year. There are real, measurable benefits for some organizations to move their data to the cloud.
Yet beneath this silver lining may be a dark cloud. Many companies, such as these, are discovering after the fact that with some cloud solutions, information governance is lacking or non-existent:
- One West Coast manufacturing company's IT organization contracted with cloud vendor to host and store the company's email. IT negotiated—without consulting the legal or compliance departments—for the cloud provider to retain all email for two years. One year and 11 months into the contract, IT announced the imminent, automatic email deletion, per the negotiated agreement. However, there was one slight problem: The company was involved in more than 50 active litigation matters, and some of the email in the cloud subject to deletion had the potential to be relevant to this ongoing litigation. Furthermore, there was no effective way to easily search the emails, or selectively retrieve emails from particular individuals. Rather, the entire email corpus had to be exported before it could be searched, which was a slow and expensive process.
- When the U.S. Justice Department shut down the online file storage company Megaupload for alleged criminal activity, it also shutdown access for thousands of other legitimate and legal users. There is a similar lack of precision when investigators subpoena data—they often seek all of the content on a system, and there is little effort to ferret out to whom certain data belongs. The physical analogy is if police were to search all lockers in a rented storage facility not just the one targeted by a search warrant. In a comment to the Wall Street Journal, Julie Samuels, a staff attorney with the San Francisco-based digital-rights firm Electronic Frontier Foundation, said she was “concerned about the users who had no due process, and no notice—and no access to their data.”
Cloud computing does hold the promise of lower costs, better service levels and easier management. Yet organizations are well advised to consider their information governance requirements before jumping right into a cloud.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250