Regulatory: A primer on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Aside from creating a lot of controversy, President Obamas recess appointment of Richard Cordray as the first director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) left many people asking: What exactly is the CFPB and what does it do?
February 08, 2012 at 06:25 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Aside from creating a lot of controversy, President Obama's recess appointment of Richard Cordray as the first director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) left many people asking: What exactly is the CFPB and what does it do? In addition to bringing together under one roof the various rules, regulations and oversight authority that have historically been spread over multiple federal agencies and departments, the CFPB was created to educate consumers regarding financial matters and to extend federal oversight to non-bank entities that provide financial products or services to consumers.
The CFPB was created in July 2010 as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Dodd-Frank Act increases federal oversight of the financial industry. The CFPB, which will ultimately operate as a bureau within the Federal Reserve, was created specifically to adopt rules and regulations to oversee businesses that provide financial products and services to consumers, including credit cards, student loans, mortgages, check cashing services, pay-day loans, online banking and credit reports.
In the words of the U.S. Department of Treasury, the CFPB is tasked with assuring that consumer financial products and services “promote fairness and transparency.” One of the CFPB's primary goals is to eliminate the consumer confusion and frustration that comes with poorly disclosed penalty fees and surprise charges common to many consumer financial products.
The regulatory reach of the CFPB extends to banks and credit unions (that have been regulated by the federal government for many years) as well as to non-bank entities providing financial products and services to consumers. Non-bank entities have not historically been subject to federal supervision to the same extent as banks and credit unions.
Under the terms of the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB was not allowed to regulate non-bank entities until its director was in place. One of the first items of business of newly appointed Director Cordray was to initiate the CFPB's supervision program of non-bank entities. Pay-day lenders and “buy here pay here” auto dealers are among the first non-bank entities to come under the CFPB's scrutiny. Next on the list will be student loan providers, who will be required to provide students and their families with accurate, complete and understandable information to allow them to make informed decisions in financing a higher education.
According to the CFPB, its core function is to protect consumers in financial matters. It intends to carry out this function by doing the following:
- Conduct rule-making, supervision and enforcement for federal consumer financial protection laws
- Restrict unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices
- Take consumer complaints
- Promote financial education
- Research consumer behavior
- Monitor financial markets for new risks to consumers
- Enforce laws that outlaw discrimination and other unfair treatment in consumer finance
Love it or hate it, the CFPB is certain to affect each of us in our personal and business life.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250