Technology: 4 tips to managing Internet governance risks
Internet governance developments have reached a tipping point
February 09, 2012 at 08:21 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A basic point of my earlier posts is that Internet governance presents business risks. But what can counsel do to manage them?
This post offers a few suggestions. It summarizes the regulatory environment and suggests how Internet governance can be added as an element of strategic planning for any business—but especially for those businesses whose reliance on the Internet is profound, and whose risk from changed Internet policies is high.
Regulatory Environment
- ICANN is the Internet's unseen regulator. Its unique global authority allows it to set the terms by which access to the Internet is available.
- ICANN's policies can disrupt business plans. Its decisions to allow for new generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs), such as .Canon and .NYC, and to allow for a TLD dedicated to adult content (.XXX) are two recent examples.
- ICANN's policy-making is intensely active. Proposals, counter-proposals and modifications are happening all the time. The intensity of this activity means that anything less than total currency is inadequate to be aware of salient risks, much less to safeguard an organization from them.
Internet governance occurs in an unusually challenging regulatory environment. Managing the resulting risks suggest the need to incorporate Internet governance into an organization's strategic planning.
Incorporating Internet Governance
- Sound strategy begins with a fundamental understanding of the institutions and relationships that drive Internet policy. They have a unique history and legal framework that drive and constrain available policy choices.
- Determine how your organization relies on the Internet. What Internet policies does it depend on? Do you know the exact points where your organization is at greatest risk? Does a proposed policy offer previously unconsidered opportunities?
- Keep informed of what ICANN policies are being considered and be prepared to advocate for or against them
- Incorporate the analysis of Internet governance-related risks and opportunities into the organization's strategic plan. Clearly map out how they relate to the other risks and opportunities that confront your organization.
Managing the risks of Internet governance requires an awareness, in short, that they may impact every kind of organization relying on the Internet and the time to respond is now.
Internet governance is no longer the special concern of the information and communications technology sector (ICT). A recent study by McKinsey Global Institute finds that 75 percent of the economic growth attributable to the Internet comes from companies not directly associated with ICT. Internet governance has entered the mainstream of management issues that must be understood and mastered for an organization to effectively pursue its goals.
Developments in Internet governance have reached a tipping point. For a business whose reliance on the Internet runs deep, it is no longer prudent to stand by waiting for conflicted policy issues to be sorted out by others. Just as it would be ill-advised to operate a chemical plant without understanding the demands of the EPA and engaging the notice-and-comment process when a proposed rule will affect business operations, a similar forward-looking approach is necessary when it comes to Internet governance, and to ICANN.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
GCs Jettisoning Zero-Based Budgeting in Quest to Be Nimble, More Efficient
3 minute readFoley & Lardner Litigator Joins Brewers Roster as Legal Chief
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250