BP reaches $7.8 billion settlement with victims of Gulf oil spill
Nearly two years after an offshore explosion leaked nearly 5 billion barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, British Petroleum (BP) has reached a $7.8 billion settlement with businesses and individuals who sued over the spill.
March 05, 2012 at 06:59 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Nearly two years after an offshore explosion leaked almost 5 billion barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, British Petroleum (BP) has reached a $7.8 billion settlement with businesses and individuals who sued over the spill.
The settlement includes hundreds of thousands of plaintiffs whose livelihoods suffered in the wake of the disaster. It will be broken down into two categories of claims: economic and medical. Economic claims include fishermen, hoteliers and others who lost business due to the spill; medical claims will provide financial compensation and ongoing medical consultation to those with spill-related health issues.
BP settled three days before the case's scheduled court date. Although a trial could have potentially brought a larger financial award, plaintiffs may have been wary of a protracted legal battle, such as the 20-year courtroom drama after the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill.
The settlement was much lower than the $14 billion some analysts had predicted, according to Bloomberg. After news of the deal, the company's shares jumped as much as 3.1 percent.
BP still faces claims from the U.S. government, Gulf states and drilling partners, which could total billions of dollars, according to Thomson Reuters. The petroleum giant has filed its own suits against Transocean Ltd., which owned the exploded Deepwater Horizon oil rig, and Halliburton Co., which cemented the Macondo well.
Nearly two years after an offshore explosion leaked almost 5 billion barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, British Petroleum (BP) has reached a $7.8 billion settlement with businesses and individuals who sued over the spill.
The settlement includes hundreds of thousands of plaintiffs whose livelihoods suffered in the wake of the disaster. It will be broken down into two categories of claims: economic and medical. Economic claims include fishermen, hoteliers and others who lost business due to the spill; medical claims will provide financial compensation and ongoing medical consultation to those with spill-related health issues.
BP settled three days before the case's scheduled court date. Although a trial could have potentially brought a larger financial award, plaintiffs may have been wary of a protracted legal battle, such as the 20-year courtroom drama after the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill.
The settlement was much lower than the $14 billion some analysts had predicted, according to Bloomberg. After news of the deal, the company's shares jumped as much as 3.1 percent.
BP still faces claims from the U.S. government, Gulf states and drilling partners, which could total billions of dollars, according to Thomson Reuters. The petroleum giant has filed its own suits against Transocean Ltd., which owned the exploded Deepwater Horizon oil rig, and Halliburton Co., which cemented the Macondo well.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Texas Shows the Way Forward in Resolving Mass Tort Gridlock
- 2Ninth Circuit Rules on Inherent Authority and FRCP 37(e)
- 3Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
- 4Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
- 5People in the News—Dec. 2, 2024—Marshall Dennehey, Pollock Begg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250