NFL bounty programs could land teams in court
Its no secret that football is a violent sport that can result in some serious injuries, but four National Football League (NFL) teams may have crossed a legal line by putting secret bounties on opposing players, including quarterbacks Brett Favre and Kurt Warner.
March 05, 2012 at 06:52 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's no secret that football is a violent sport that can result in some serious injuries, but four National Football League (NFL) teams may have crossed a legal line by putting secret bounties on opposing players, including quarterbacks Brett Favre and Kurt Warner.
The Washington Redskins, Buffalo Bills, Tennessee Titans and New Orleans Saints were allegedly involved in “pay for pain” programs that financially rewarded defensive players for inflicting game-ending hits on opponents. Knockouts were worth $1,500, and cart-offs netted $1,000. Defensive coordinator Gregg Williams, who left the Saints for the Saint Louis Rams in the off-season, coached all four teams.
The NFL likely will hand down punishments that could include loss of draft picks, fines and suspensions, but the teams also may face legal action from injured opponents. The central question is whether players accept the possibility of injury simply by playing, or whether the bounty system represented a risk beyond normal expectations.
Football hits have been criminally prosecuted in the past. In 1973, Cincinnati Bengals fullback Boobie Clark struck Denver Broncos defensive back Dale Hackbart on the back of the neck with his forearm after an interception. Although he played for several more weeks, Hackbart was eventually diagnosed with a career-ending neck fracture. He filed a $1 million lawsuit against Clark. An appeals court ruled that players can be held responsible for recklessly endangering opponents.
The teams also could face a class action civil suit from fans who attended the games in question, according to Reuters. If fans claim that they paid to watch games based on athletic skill, not secret bets, they could potentially recover ticket costs.
It's no secret that football is a violent sport that can result in some serious injuries, but four National Football League (NFL) teams may have crossed a legal line by putting secret bounties on opposing players, including quarterbacks Brett Favre and Kurt Warner.
The Washington Redskins, Buffalo Bills, Tennessee Titans and New Orleans Saints were allegedly involved in “pay for pain” programs that financially rewarded defensive players for inflicting game-ending hits on opponents. Knockouts were worth $1,500, and cart-offs netted $1,000. Defensive coordinator Gregg Williams, who left the Saints for the Saint Louis Rams in the off-season, coached all four teams.
The NFL likely will hand down punishments that could include loss of draft picks, fines and suspensions, but the teams also may face legal action from injured opponents. The central question is whether players accept the possibility of injury simply by playing, or whether the bounty system represented a risk beyond normal expectations.
Football hits have been criminally prosecuted in the past. In 1973, Cincinnati Bengals fullback Boobie Clark struck Denver Broncos defensive back Dale Hackbart on the back of the neck with his forearm after an interception. Although he played for several more weeks, Hackbart was eventually diagnosed with a career-ending neck fracture. He filed a $1 million lawsuit against Clark. An appeals court ruled that players can be held responsible for recklessly endangering opponents.
The teams also could face a class action civil suit from fans who attended the games in question, according to Reuters. If fans claim that they paid to watch games based on athletic skill, not secret bets, they could potentially recover ticket costs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250