Tyco settlement lawyers say $464 million fee was out of their control
Lawyers at the Delaware firm Grant & Eisenhofer (G&E) are learning the true meaning of the phrase mo money, mo problems.
March 09, 2012 at 05:54 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lawyers at the Delaware firm Grant & Eisenhofer (G&E) are learning the true meaning of the phrase “mo' money, mo' problems.”
In 2007, G&E negotiated a $3.2 billion settlement on behalf of a group of shareholders against the global manufacturing company Tyco International Ltd. The shareholders, the Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana (TRSL), had signed a contract with the firm in 2004 that would cap fees at 8.7 percent of the total recovery. But when both sides reached a settlement three years later, the court awarded G&E and other law firms involved in the case 14.5 percent, or $464 million. A Tyco shareholder and former G&E lawyer, John Gielata, is now suing G&E, claiming the firm never disclosed the agreement to the court.
In a court filing yesterday, G&E rebuffed the allegations, saying the fee is valid because TRSL asked two retired federal judges for a fee recommendation when some of the class counsel were seeking fees of up to 17.5 percent. Additionally, the firm claims it had a verbal agreement with TRSL that the 2004 contract would be void if the two sides couldn't reach a quick settlement.
“It would be manifestly unjust, as well as lacking in any legal basis, to deprive lead plaintiff TRSL of its flexibility in this respect, or to hold G&E responsible for a result over which it had no control,” G&E lawyer Sanford I. Weisburst said in the court filing.
According to Forbes, Gielata's suit might not have legs given the fact that the same court approved the fee in the first place and threw out a similar challenge last year.
Lawyers at the Delaware firm
In 2007, G&E negotiated a $3.2 billion settlement on behalf of a group of shareholders against the global manufacturing company Tyco International Ltd. The shareholders, the Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana (TRSL), had signed a contract with the firm in 2004 that would cap fees at 8.7 percent of the total recovery. But when both sides reached a settlement three years later, the court awarded G&E and other law firms involved in the case 14.5 percent, or $464 million. A Tyco shareholder and former G&E lawyer, John Gielata, is now suing G&E, claiming the firm never disclosed the agreement to the court.
In a court filing yesterday, G&E rebuffed the allegations, saying the fee is valid because TRSL asked two retired federal judges for a fee recommendation when some of the class counsel were seeking fees of up to 17.5 percent. Additionally, the firm claims it had a verbal agreement with TRSL that the 2004 contract would be void if the two sides couldn't reach a quick settlement.
“It would be manifestly unjust, as well as lacking in any legal basis, to deprive lead plaintiff TRSL of its flexibility in this respect, or to hold G&E responsible for a result over which it had no control,” G&E lawyer Sanford I. Weisburst said in the court filing.
According to Forbes, Gielata's suit might not have legs given the fact that the same court approved the fee in the first place and threw out a similar challenge last year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute read
Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Data Breach Lawsuit Against Byte Federal Among 1,500 Targeting Companies in 2024
- 2Counterfeiters Ride Surge in Tabletop Games’ Popularity, Challenging IP Owners to Keep Up
- 3Health Care Data Breach Class Actions Saw December Surge in NY Courts
- 4Florida Supreme Court Disbars 3, Suspends 11, Reprimands 1 in Final Disciplinary Order of 2024
- 5Chief Justice Roberts Ends Year With Defense Against 'Illegitimate' Attacks on Judiciary
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
