Technology: Website accessibility for the disabled
It is only a matter of time before the DOJ mandates that websites will have to be accessible to the disabled.
March 23, 2012 at 05:30 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is poised to issue regulations that will reshape websites across the U.S. It is only a matter of time before the DOJ mandates that websites will have to be accessible to the disabled. The meaning of accessibility and the deadline for accomplishing it will be addressed in the new regulations, which are expected within the next six to 12 months.
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) developed by the Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C) will likely be adopted by the DOJ or will play a substantial role in shaping the new website accessibility regulations. Accessibility issues addressed by the WCAG include, but are not limited to:
- Providing text alternatives for photographs, charts and graphics so they can be changed into large print or Braille for visually impaired users
- Making video accessible via text and sequencing
- Minimizing the use of blinking and flashing
- Providing documents in text-based, not image-based formats, for ease of reading
- Using “skip navigation” links so that core website material can be immediately accessed
- Ensuring that all material conveyed in color also is available without color
The DOJ intends for these or similar standards to apply to all websites that transact business. This is an aggressive view of the current state of the law. There is an open legal question as to whether Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was intended to apply to websites at all, particularly where there is no nexus between a website and a physical store, such as a retail location.
There also is a question of whether informational aspects of a website need to be made accessible under the ADA. The DOJ is taking an expansive view of the law, and it is expected that all websites that transact business, regardless of whether there is a physical nexus between the website and a store location, will have to comply with the new regulations and be made accessible.
As to the regulations themselves, it is expected that websites that are placed online six months after the regulations are issued will be covered. This includes brand-new websites or completely redesigned websites. Likewise, new pages added to existing website (as opposed to a complete redesign) also will likely need to be accessible under the new regulations to the maximum extent possible.
The DOJ is considering permitting existing websites to comply with the new regulations two years after the effective date. The DOJ also is considering limiting the new regulations to websites of a certain size (such as companies with 15 or more employees or that earn a certain amount of revenue) or in certain categories (such as retail websites).
Retailers now face quite a bit of uncertainty and risk. The DOJ is not waiting on its regulations to enforce its view of the law. The DOJ already has published several consent decrees that require companies to comply with the WCAG. Moreover, private litigation also is on the rise. There is an existing group of highly educated and well-funded plaintiffs' attorneys who are profiting from this new development under the ADA, and are poised to increase their business under the new DOJ regulations. New settlements are consistently being reported, which, again, generally require compliance with WCAG standards.
In light of this uncertainty, companies should review their own websites to assess risk in relation to the WCAG. They should pay particular attention to the retail portions of the website and, at a minimum, modifications should be considered for features that make online retail transactions inaccessible to blind and deaf patrons—the two biggest disability groups that are filing website accessibility lawsuits today.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is poised to issue regulations that will reshape websites across the U.S. It is only a matter of time before the DOJ mandates that websites will have to be accessible to the disabled. The meaning of accessibility and the deadline for accomplishing it will be addressed in the new regulations, which are expected within the next six to 12 months.
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) developed by the Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C) will likely be adopted by the DOJ or will play a substantial role in shaping the new website accessibility regulations. Accessibility issues addressed by the WCAG include, but are not limited to:
- Providing text alternatives for photographs, charts and graphics so they can be changed into large print or Braille for visually impaired users
- Making video accessible via text and sequencing
- Minimizing the use of blinking and flashing
- Providing documents in text-based, not image-based formats, for ease of reading
- Using “skip navigation” links so that core website material can be immediately accessed
- Ensuring that all material conveyed in color also is available without color
The DOJ intends for these or similar standards to apply to all websites that transact business. This is an aggressive view of the current state of the law. There is an open legal question as to whether Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was intended to apply to websites at all, particularly where there is no nexus between a website and a physical store, such as a retail location.
There also is a question of whether informational aspects of a website need to be made accessible under the ADA. The DOJ is taking an expansive view of the law, and it is expected that all websites that transact business, regardless of whether there is a physical nexus between the website and a store location, will have to comply with the new regulations and be made accessible.
As to the regulations themselves, it is expected that websites that are placed online six months after the regulations are issued will be covered. This includes brand-new websites or completely redesigned websites. Likewise, new pages added to existing website (as opposed to a complete redesign) also will likely need to be accessible under the new regulations to the maximum extent possible.
The DOJ is considering permitting existing websites to comply with the new regulations two years after the effective date. The DOJ also is considering limiting the new regulations to websites of a certain size (such as companies with 15 or more employees or that earn a certain amount of revenue) or in certain categories (such as retail websites).
Retailers now face quite a bit of uncertainty and risk. The DOJ is not waiting on its regulations to enforce its view of the law. The DOJ already has published several consent decrees that require companies to comply with the WCAG. Moreover, private litigation also is on the rise. There is an existing group of highly educated and well-funded plaintiffs' attorneys who are profiting from this new development under the ADA, and are poised to increase their business under the new DOJ regulations. New settlements are consistently being reported, which, again, generally require compliance with WCAG standards.
In light of this uncertainty, companies should review their own websites to assess risk in relation to the WCAG. They should pay particular attention to the retail portions of the website and, at a minimum, modifications should be considered for features that make online retail transactions inaccessible to blind and deaf patrons—the two biggest disability groups that are filing website accessibility lawsuits today.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAI Adoption, Data Center Building Boom Opening More Doors for Cybercriminals, Many of Them Teenagers
Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250