Hildebrandt Institute says 20 law firms merged in Q1 2012
What a difference variant recording metrics make. On Monday, legal consultancy Altman Weil Inc. released a report indicating that 2012s M&A activity continues the rebound of law firm combinations that began in Q3 2010 and held firm through all of 2011. Altman Weil reported that there have been 14 mergers...
April 05, 2012 at 07:43 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
What a difference variant recording metrics make.
On Monday, legal consultancy Altman Weil Inc. released a report indicating that 2012's M&A activity continues the rebound of law firm combinations that began in Q3 2010 and held firm through all of 2011. Altman Weil reported that there have been 14 mergers and acquisitions announced in the U.S. in Q1 2012, which is on pace compared to 16 in Q1 2011 and about 15 over the past six quarters.
The next day, the Hildebrandt Institute released its own report on U.S. law firm M&A activity in Q1 2012, which contained rather divergent statistics. Hildebrandt tracked 20 completed law firm mergers in Q1, which it says represents a 43 percent increase over Q1 2011 (which saw 14 mergers) and a drastic jump compared to Q1 2010 (which saw four mergers).
Like Altman Weil, Hildebrandt says merger activity so far in 2012 is more in line with pre-recessionary levels—33 completed mergers in Q1 2009 and 22 in Q1 2008. Taking it one step further, Hildebrandt says, “[i]t appears that law firm merger activity has been encouraged by signs of economic recovery.”
The difference between the Altman Weil and Hildebrandt reports is that Altman Weil counts mergers when they're announced instead of when they're finalized. Additionally, Hildebrandt only includes mergers where the acquired firm has five or more attorneys, while Altman Weil also includes smaller mergers.
All of the law firms Hildebrandt mentions also appear in Altman Weil's survey, either in their report on Q1 2012 or in its 2011 annual report, Reuters reports. Hildebrandt does not make its full firm list public.
For more, read Reuters.
What a difference variant recording metrics make.
On Monday, legal consultancy Altman Weil Inc. released a report indicating that 2012's M&A activity continues the rebound of law firm combinations that began in Q3 2010 and held firm through all of 2011. Altman Weil reported that there have been 14 mergers and acquisitions announced in the U.S. in Q1 2012, which is on pace compared to 16 in Q1 2011 and about 15 over the past six quarters.
The next day, the Hildebrandt Institute released its own report on U.S. law firm M&A activity in Q1 2012, which contained rather divergent statistics. Hildebrandt tracked 20 completed law firm mergers in Q1, which it says represents a 43 percent increase over Q1 2011 (which saw 14 mergers) and a drastic jump compared to Q1 2010 (which saw four mergers).
Like Altman Weil, Hildebrandt says merger activity so far in 2012 is more in line with pre-recessionary levels—33 completed mergers in Q1 2009 and 22 in Q1 2008. Taking it one step further, Hildebrandt says, “[i]t appears that law firm merger activity has been encouraged by signs of economic recovery.”
The difference between the Altman Weil and Hildebrandt reports is that Altman Weil counts mergers when they're announced instead of when they're finalized. Additionally, Hildebrandt only includes mergers where the acquired firm has five or more attorneys, while Altman Weil also includes smaller mergers.
All of the law firms Hildebrandt mentions also appear in Altman Weil's survey, either in their report on Q1 2012 or in its 2011 annual report, Reuters reports. Hildebrandt does not make its full firm list public.
For more, read Reuters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Beyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250