Technology: Friending the unions
Todays labor law practitioners increasingly hear a common troubling narrative: that an employer was blindsided by a union filing a petition to organize its workforce.
April 20, 2012 at 05:00 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Today's labor law practitioners increasingly hear a common troubling narrative: that an employer was blindsided by a union filing a petition to organize its workforce. Historically, employers have been able to see signs of nascent union organizing: union literature and cards in the workplace, union staff visiting the worksite or reports of unwelcome home visits, for example. But these traditional forms of union organizing now frequently are preceded by extensive social media campaigns, subtly imposing the union's message months before actual card-signing efforts. The result is that the workforce is subjected to a message campaign perhaps well before the employer knows its workforce has been targeted. This deprives the employer of the ability to take early responsive measures, putting employers at a communication disadvantage that may be insurmountable.
Social media as an organizing tool: Why it is effective
Social media provides substantial advantages over traditional organizing tactics:
1. It removes logistical obstacles. Traditional methods of union organizing require personal interaction, exposure and a substantial investment of time. For example, the dispatching of union representatives to distribute fliers, approaching workers personally to coordinate meetings, or making home visits requires a team of qualified organizers. It frequently entails confrontation, either with management, law enforcement authorities or even the employees themselves. The social media approach has permitted organizers to approach workers without any such obstacles. They can communicate privately, gradually over time, from their home workstations or cell phones, and at a time when conflicting family responsibilities do not distract.
2. It provides “targeted” and accessible messaging. The social media organizer may tailor his or her message to a particular employee and may nurture a relationship over time (such as becoming Facebook friends), focusing on the individual concerns of that employee or small group. This also allows a sustained effort aimed at a leader within the workforce whose influence will offer great advantage at the card-signing stage.
3. It is the language of youth. Social media is the language of the new generation of workers in the U.S., and, increasingly, of women. More and more, these demographic groups talk in terms of tweets, posts and YouTube videos. And they trust people and entities who speak that language more than those who do not. One of the powerful elements of social media is the ability to manufacture a sense of camaraderie and inclusion, and labor unions are capitalizing on that feature.
The tactics: How unions use social media
Even a cursory review of publicly available sites illustrates the extent of labor unions' use of social media. Today, every major labor union has a prominent social media community, such as a Facebook page, that pushes out the union message. These pages provide links to YouTube libraries where the unions have posted video messages, stories and instructional films. The Teamsters have a YouTube library containing more than 200 searchable videos, supplemented regularly with new messages about the benefits of being a Teamster or the recent organizing victory of one of its Locals.
More directly, union staff uses social media to initiate conversations with key employees that can play out over time and in confidence. According to a July 2010 report by the University of California, Berkeley's Labor Center titled “New Approaches to Organizing Women and Young Workers,” union organizers use texting to communicate with employees at work, sometimes during the employer's own campaign meetings. Other organizers solicit target recruits to become friends on Facebook, noting that the tactic is particularly effective with women and younger workers.
The unions also use social media to develop leads on other individuals who are receptive to the union message. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union's (UFCW) “Target Change” page (covering the campaign to organize Target) solicits visitors' email addresses in exchange for novelty giveaways. An International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local invites: “If you're interested in organizing a union in your workplace, just send us an email—an organizer will contact you.” The Transport Workers Union's Facebook page includes a “Join The Movement” link through which it invites visitors to provide their names, email addresses and geographic data.
What employers must do
Employers who value union-free status must provide an alternative to the message and forum offered by the unions. Employers must establish a social media presence for the employer and for the workforce that communicates an honest pro-employer message and also permits employees to communicate with one another. Management must proceed cautiously into this arena to ensure compliance with employment and labor laws. But a robust social media presence will become more essential to the employer as unions become more nimble at tweeting, texting, and friending its workforce.
If employers are not willing to cede the social media space to unions, they must match the unions' investment in understanding and using this potent new communication tool.
Today's labor law practitioners increasingly hear a common troubling narrative: that an employer was blindsided by a union filing a petition to organize its workforce. Historically, employers have been able to see signs of nascent union organizing: union literature and cards in the workplace, union staff visiting the worksite or reports of unwelcome home visits, for example. But these traditional forms of union organizing now frequently are preceded by extensive social media campaigns, subtly imposing the union's message months before actual card-signing efforts. The result is that the workforce is subjected to a message campaign perhaps well before the employer knows its workforce has been targeted. This deprives the employer of the ability to take early responsive measures, putting employers at a communication disadvantage that may be insurmountable.
Social media as an organizing tool: Why it is effective
Social media provides substantial advantages over traditional organizing tactics:
1. It removes logistical obstacles. Traditional methods of union organizing require personal interaction, exposure and a substantial investment of time. For example, the dispatching of union representatives to distribute fliers, approaching workers personally to coordinate meetings, or making home visits requires a team of qualified organizers. It frequently entails confrontation, either with management, law enforcement authorities or even the employees themselves. The social media approach has permitted organizers to approach workers without any such obstacles. They can communicate privately, gradually over time, from their home workstations or cell phones, and at a time when conflicting family responsibilities do not distract.
2. It provides “targeted” and accessible messaging. The social media organizer may tailor his or her message to a particular employee and may nurture a relationship over time (such as becoming Facebook friends), focusing on the individual concerns of that employee or small group. This also allows a sustained effort aimed at a leader within the workforce whose influence will offer great advantage at the card-signing stage.
3. It is the language of youth. Social media is the language of the new generation of workers in the U.S., and, increasingly, of women. More and more, these demographic groups talk in terms of tweets, posts and YouTube videos. And they trust people and entities who speak that language more than those who do not. One of the powerful elements of social media is the ability to manufacture a sense of camaraderie and inclusion, and labor unions are capitalizing on that feature.
The tactics: How unions use social media
Even a cursory review of publicly available sites illustrates the extent of labor unions' use of social media. Today, every major labor union has a prominent social media community, such as a Facebook page, that pushes out the union message. These pages provide links to YouTube libraries where the unions have posted video messages, stories and instructional films. The Teamsters have a YouTube library containing more than 200 searchable videos, supplemented regularly with new messages about the benefits of being a Teamster or the recent organizing victory of one of its Locals.
More directly, union staff uses social media to initiate conversations with key employees that can play out over time and in confidence. According to a July 2010 report by the University of California, Berkeley's Labor Center titled “New Approaches to Organizing Women and Young Workers,” union organizers use texting to communicate with employees at work, sometimes during the employer's own campaign meetings. Other organizers solicit target recruits to become friends on Facebook, noting that the tactic is particularly effective with women and younger workers.
The unions also use social media to develop leads on other individuals who are receptive to the union message. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union's (UFCW) “Target Change” page (covering the campaign to organize Target) solicits visitors' email addresses in exchange for novelty giveaways. An International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local invites: “If you're interested in organizing a union in your workplace, just send us an email—an organizer will contact you.” The Transport Workers Union's Facebook page includes a “Join The Movement” link through which it invites visitors to provide their names, email addresses and geographic data.
What employers must do
Employers who value union-free status must provide an alternative to the message and forum offered by the unions. Employers must establish a social media presence for the employer and for the workforce that communicates an honest pro-employer message and also permits employees to communicate with one another. Management must proceed cautiously into this arena to ensure compliance with employment and labor laws. But a robust social media presence will become more essential to the employer as unions become more nimble at tweeting, texting, and friending its workforce.
If employers are not willing to cede the social media space to unions, they must match the unions' investment in understanding and using this potent new communication tool.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readLegal Chief of Retailer Beyond Exiting at Tumultuous Time
'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250