Purina and Walmart sued over dog’s death
A Chicago-area man is suing Nestle Purina Petcare Co. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. over the death of his 9-year-old Pomeranian, Cleopatra.
April 23, 2012 at 04:00 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A Chicago-area man is suing Nestle Purina Petcare Co. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. over the death of his 9-year-old Pomeranian, Cleopatra.
According to the suit, which Dennis Adkins filed on Wednesday, he bought Purina's Waggin' Train Yam Good product, which are chicken jerky dog treats made in China, at Walmart and fed them to Cleopatra for three days in mid-March. His complaint says he changed nothing else in the dog's diet. Cleopatra soon became ill and died of kidney failure on March 26. Adkins' other Pomeranian, who is also 9 years old, did not eat the treats and did not become ill.
Five years ago, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning about illnesses associated with chicken jerky treats from China. And in November 2011, the FDA had reported an increase in complaints of dog illnesses from the China-made treats.
“Who in their right mind would feed something to an animal that has an FDA warning?” Adkins said in an interview with Thomson Reuters. “I would not buy the product.”
A Purina spokesman told Reuters the company believes the claims in the suit are without merit, and it plans to fight the allegations.
Adkins named Wal-Mart in the suit as well because the world's largest retailer requires its suppliers to comply with pet food safety regulations. “Wal-Mart is the world's No. 1 retailer,” Adkins said in the interview. “If Wal-Mart can't step up to the plate and say the product has a question mark about it, and take it down, then who's going to?”
A Wal-Mart spokesman said the company requires the same high standards from its pet food suppliers as it does from its human food suppliers.
The suit seeks class action status on behalf of all consumers who have bought the treats or similar products, as well as people who have dogs that have eaten the treats and become ill.
A Chicago-area man is suing
According to the suit, which
Five years ago, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning about illnesses associated with chicken jerky treats from China. And in November 2011, the FDA had reported an increase in complaints of dog illnesses from the China-made treats.
“Who in their right mind would feed something to an animal that has an FDA warning?” Adkins said in an interview with Thomson Reuters. “I would not buy the product.”
A Purina spokesman told Reuters the company believes the claims in the suit are without merit, and it plans to fight the allegations.
Adkins named
A
The suit seeks class action status on behalf of all consumers who have bought the treats or similar products, as well as people who have dogs that have eaten the treats and become ill.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1'Pickier' Law Firms Did Mergers At Same Rate Last Year as 2023
- 2Boxing Promoter Don King Hit With $3B Lawsuit Over Cancellation of 'Rumble in the Jungle 2'
- 3Letter From London: 5 Predictions for Big Law in 2025, Plus 5 More Risky Ones
- 4Crypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
- 5Jenner Brings Back Zachary Schauf from DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250