3 companies discuss social media governance policies
Given the furor last month when news that companies are asking prospective employees for their Facebook passwords made national headlines, it should come as little surprise that a panel of experts weighed in on how best to manage corporate social media policies on the second day of InsideCounsels 12th annual...
April 24, 2012 at 01:58 PM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Given the furor last month when news that companies are asking prospective employees for their Facebook passwords made national headlines, it should come as little surprise that a panel of experts weighed in on how best to manage corporate social media policies on the second day of InsideCounsel's 12th annual SuperConference.
A trio of corporate counsel—Kimberly Cilke, deputy general counsel of Go Daddy Operating Co.; E. Alan Arnold, assistant general counsel at Delta Air Lines Inc.; and Shannon Couffer, senior attorney, litigation and regulatory law at Walgreen Co.—talked to the audience about the rapidly evolving but ever-present and important topic of social media governance.
Cilke, who arrived at domain name registrar Go Daddy just prior to the social media explosion in early 2007, said that her legal department quickly realized that they needed to deal with the new online landscape, especially given how active and interested the tech company's employees were in social media.
“We queried everyone who was using social media and developed a program to utilize social media for their products, and we realized that we needed a dedicated social media team,” she said. “But it took awhile to get everyone to recognize the need for a cohesive team.”
Eventually, Go Daddy developed an internal social media policy that has very specific guidelines for employees who are authorized to post on behalf of the domain name giant. However, before those employees are given free rein to engage the social media universe, they first must go through a training and certification program. Cilke then shared with the audience a six-point list of potential suggestions for companies to follow when putting together social media policies:
- Include a general disclaimer in social media policies to indicate Section 7 rights are not infringed.
“A general disclaimer alone is not sufficient,” Cilke said. “You need to include specific examples in your policy.”
- Limit policy to communications about company products or services and anti-harassment guidelines
- Exclude general information on wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment from the definition of “confidential” information
- It's OK to ban “maliciously false” communications where an employee learns information is false and intends to harm the company and co-workers
- Indicate restrictions on use of company logos and trademarks
- Consider separate social media policies for employees' general use and for when they're representing the company
Social media use also is important at Delta.
“One thing that makes social media so relevant to an airline is because each of our 13,000 daily flights is a unique customer experience,” Arnold told attendees.
Delta, which in January was rated the No. 1 most tech-friendly airline by PCWorld magazine, now receives immediate customer feedback from passengers on many of its WiFi-enabled flights. As a result of this real-time passenger response, the airline has customer service representatives who will occasionally engage those customers via social media to offer assistance.
Arnold said Delta also uses analytics tools to monitor what's being said about both their brand and their competitors, and analyzes the data in an attempt to predict behavior and proactively manage its affairs.
Couffer agreed with her fellow panelists, noting that the company realized around the time of the social media explosion that it needed to expand from its traditional marketing model and reach out to more groups of people.
Being a pharmacy, Couffer said that Walgreens had an added issue to deal with when it came to monitoring its social media channels.
“We have a unique problem—if someone posts a complaint about a Walgreens product on a social media site, we have an obligation under the [Food and Drug Administration] guidelines to investigate the claim and make sure that the product isn't harmful to our customers.” For more on social media and corporate policies, read the following InsideCounsel content:
Given the furor last month when news that companies are asking prospective employees for their Facebook passwords made national headlines, it should come as little surprise that a panel of experts weighed in on how best to manage corporate social media policies on the second day of InsideCounsel's 12th annual SuperConference.
A trio of corporate counsel—Kimberly Cilke, deputy general counsel of Go Daddy Operating Co.; E. Alan Arnold, assistant general counsel at
Cilke, who arrived at domain name registrar Go Daddy just prior to the social media explosion in early 2007, said that her legal department quickly realized that they needed to deal with the new online landscape, especially given how active and interested the tech company's employees were in social media.
“We queried everyone who was using social media and developed a program to utilize social media for their products, and we realized that we needed a dedicated social media team,” she said. “But it took awhile to get everyone to recognize the need for a cohesive team.”
Eventually, Go Daddy developed an internal social media policy that has very specific guidelines for employees who are authorized to post on behalf of the domain name giant. However, before those employees are given free rein to engage the social media universe, they first must go through a training and certification program. Cilke then shared with the audience a six-point list of potential suggestions for companies to follow when putting together social media policies:
- Include a general disclaimer in social media policies to indicate Section 7 rights are not infringed.
“A general disclaimer alone is not sufficient,” Cilke said. “You need to include specific examples in your policy.”
- Limit policy to communications about company products or services and anti-harassment guidelines
- Exclude general information on wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment from the definition of “confidential” information
- It's OK to ban “maliciously false” communications where an employee learns information is false and intends to harm the company and co-workers
- Indicate restrictions on use of company logos and trademarks
- Consider separate social media policies for employees' general use and for when they're representing the company
Social media use also is important at Delta.
“One thing that makes social media so relevant to an airline is because each of our 13,000 daily flights is a unique customer experience,” Arnold told attendees.
Delta, which in January was rated the No. 1 most tech-friendly airline by PCWorld magazine, now receives immediate customer feedback from passengers on many of its WiFi-enabled flights. As a result of this real-time passenger response, the airline has customer service representatives who will occasionally engage those customers via social media to offer assistance.
Arnold said Delta also uses analytics tools to monitor what's being said about both their brand and their competitors, and analyzes the data in an attempt to predict behavior and proactively manage its affairs.
Couffer agreed with her fellow panelists, noting that the company realized around the time of the social media explosion that it needed to expand from its traditional marketing model and reach out to more groups of people.
Being a pharmacy, Couffer said that Walgreens had an added issue to deal with when it came to monitoring its social media channels.
“We have a unique problem—if someone posts a complaint about a Walgreens product on a social media site, we have an obligation under the [Food and Drug Administration] guidelines to investigate the claim and make sure that the product isn't harmful to our customers.” For more on social media and corporate policies, read the following InsideCounsel content:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
AT&T General Counsel Joins ADM Board as Company Reels From Accounting Scandal
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250