FTC brings in a ringer to run Google antitrust investigation
Perhaps Google Inc. should be on watch. The Federal Trade Commission announced yesterday that it hired Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison Partner Beth Wilkinson to lead its antitrust investigation into whether Google has taken advantage of its prominence in web search advertising.
April 27, 2012 at 08:08 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Perhaps Google Inc. should be on watch. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced yesterday that it hired Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison Partner Beth Wilkinson to lead its antitrust investigation into whether Google has taken advantage of its prominence in web search advertising.
The FTC, which opened its antitrust investigation of Google's business practices in June 2011, also is investigating whether Google is using control of its Android mobile operating system to discourage smartphone makers from using rival company's applications.
Observers are calling the FTC's move significant, should the agency look to pursue litigation against Google.
Wilkinson, a former Justice Department prosecutor and general counsel of Fannie Mae from 2006 to 2008, is renowned for winning the death sentence against Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, and litigating for companies including Pfizer Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc. She has never lost a case.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Wilkinson is expected to be intimately involved in the FTC's decision on whether to bring a complaint against Google, and she would likely be a key part of any litigation effort.
FTC Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch told the Journal that Wilkinson would be a mentor to the agency's staff, and “is somebody who is going to carry out the duties of a trial lawyer.” He added that the agency has yet to reach any conclusions about Google.
In September 2011, Google faced an inquiry before the Senate antitrust committee over the allegations that it unfairly dominates web search engines by suppressing information from competing companies in favor of its own.
At the hearing, Google's Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt (who testified this week in Google's ongoing litigation with Oracle) openly welcomed questions from the FTC and the Senate, and defended his company by contrasting it with Microsoft Corp. and the legal debacle it endured from antitrust investigators in the 1990s.
Much of the hearing focused on Google's rapid rise to Internet dominance during its relatively short existence. Google began as a simple search engine that directed consumers to other sites for the most relevant content, but quickly evolved to provide more functionality and services to its users. In order to do so, the company acquired many businesses and applications that it now offers as its own.
For more, read the Wall Street Journal and BloombergBusinessweek.
For InsideCounsel's coverage of the FTC's antitrust investigations into Google, read:
DOJ and FTC conduct simultaneous antitrust investigations at Google
Google assuredly refutes antitrust allegations at Senate inquiry
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Newsmakers: Littler Elevates Dallas Attorney to Shareholder
- 2South Florida Real Estate Lawyers See More Deals Flow, But Concerns Linger
- 3General Counsel Accused of Destroying Evidence
- 42,000 Docket Entries: Complex South Florida Dispute Sets Precedent
- 5Incoming Howard University Law Professor Kiah Duggins Among DC Plane Crash Victims
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250