Siemens’ GC talks to NPR about bribery
While Wal-Mart Stores Inc. made big headlines last week when it came to light that executives at its Mexican subsidiary, Wal-Mart de Mexico, may have engaged in rampant bribery, the big-box retailer was far from the first large company to be thrown into the middle of this type of scandal....
May 01, 2012 at 06:58 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
While Wal-Mart Stores Inc. made big headlines last week when it came to light that executives at its Mexican subsidiary, Wal-Mart de Mexico, may have engaged in rampant bribery, the big-box retailer was far from the first large company to be thrown into the middle of this type of scandal.
In 2007, the Germany-based international technology company Siemens discovered bribery may have been taking place among its sales force, which was accused of shelling out hundreds of thousands of dollars to secure contracts from large companies and governments around the world. The company confronted the matter head-on—hiring an outside law firm to conduct a thorough investigation, which uncovered widespread corruption.
This morning, NPR's Steve Inskeep talked to Peter Solmssen, general counsel and member of the managing board of Siemens, about how the company was able to clean up the mess.
According to the report, Siemens' first step was to offer amnesty to any employee involved. “We said, 'If you come in and tell us the whole story, we will not fire you, we will not punish you, and we will try to help you with the authorities,'” Solmssen explained. And that worked. About 130 came forward to disclose their role in the corruption. Those who didn't, and were caught, were ultimately fired and prosecuted.
During the interview, Solmssen said at that time bribery was part of the business model at Siemens, and Inskeep asked if it was difficult to change that culture. “Actually not,” Solmssen responded. “It's not that hard because the employees really respond to this message. They want to do things right. Bribery, corruption is a form of theft and it's not really accepted anywhere. And our employees are thrilled to not be a part of the problem and to be a part of the solution.”
Listen to the entire NPR interview with Peter Solmssen.
While
In 2007, the Germany-based international technology company Siemens discovered bribery may have been taking place among its sales force, which was accused of shelling out hundreds of thousands of dollars to secure contracts from large companies and governments around the world. The company confronted the matter head-on—hiring an outside law firm to conduct a thorough investigation, which uncovered widespread corruption.
This morning, NPR's Steve Inskeep talked to Peter Solmssen, general counsel and member of the managing board of Siemens, about how the company was able to clean up the mess.
According to the report, Siemens' first step was to offer amnesty to any employee involved. “We said, 'If you come in and tell us the whole story, we will not fire you, we will not punish you, and we will try to help you with the authorities,'” Solmssen explained. And that worked. About 130 came forward to disclose their role in the corruption. Those who didn't, and were caught, were ultimately fired and prosecuted.
During the interview, Solmssen said at that time bribery was part of the business model at Siemens, and Inskeep asked if it was difficult to change that culture. “Actually not,” Solmssen responded. “It's not that hard because the employees really respond to this message. They want to do things right. Bribery, corruption is a form of theft and it's not really accepted anywhere. And our employees are thrilled to not be a part of the problem and to be a part of the solution.”
Listen to the entire NPR interview with Peter Solmssen.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1Letter From London: 5 Predictions for Big Law in 2025, Plus 5 More Risky Ones
- 2Crypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
- 3Jenner Brings Back Zachary Schauf from DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel
- 4'Erroneous Assumption'?: Apple Challenges DOJ Antitrust Remedy in Google Search Monopoly Case
- 5A Jury to Determine Whether Stairs Were Defectively Designed in Injury Case, State Appellate Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250