Tennis racquet maker files for bankruptcy
Prince Sports Inc., pioneer of the infamous oversized tennis racquet, has filed for Chapter 11 protection.
May 02, 2012 at 07:37 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Prince Sports Inc., pioneer of the infamous oversized tennis racquet, has filed for Chapter 11 protection. The company blames its bankruptcy on several factors, including increased competition, mounting debt and the financial crisis.
In the past 10 years, Prince has had several owners, most recently Nautic Partners and before that, Lincolnshire Management Inc. According to its bankruptcy filing, the company tried to sell rights to its brand in China in 2010 but did not receive any acceptable offers. Late last year, it initiated another sale process, and although it had three parties that were interested, no deal materialized because the investors would have paid much less than the company held in existing debt.
Prince reports its assets to be between $50 million and $100 million. However, the company says it owes $65 million in secured debt to Authentic Brands Group (ABG)-Prince LLC and another $10.2 million to various other vendors.
Prince filed for bankruptcy yesterday, after reaching a deal with ABG to acquire the struggling company.
Prince Sports Inc., pioneer of the infamous oversized tennis racquet, has filed for Chapter 11 protection. The company blames its bankruptcy on several factors, including increased competition, mounting debt and the financial crisis.
In the past 10 years, Prince has had several owners, most recently Nautic Partners and before that, Lincolnshire Management Inc. According to its bankruptcy filing, the company tried to sell rights to its brand in China in 2010 but did not receive any acceptable offers. Late last year, it initiated another sale process, and although it had three parties that were interested, no deal materialized because the investors would have paid much less than the company held in existing debt.
Prince reports its assets to be between $50 million and $100 million. However, the company says it owes $65 million in secured debt to Authentic Brands Group (ABG)-Prince LLC and another $10.2 million to various other vendors.
Prince filed for bankruptcy yesterday, after reaching a deal with ABG to acquire the struggling company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute read
Why ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1Crypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
- 2Jenner Brings Back Zachary Schauf from DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel
- 3'Erroneous Assumption'?: Apple Challenges DOJ Antitrust Remedy in Google Search Monopoly Case
- 4A Jury to Determine Whether Stairs Were Defectively Designed in Injury Case, State Appellate Court Rules
- 5Baker & Hostetler Names 24 New Partners
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
