Regulatory: Developing a political compliance plan
Compliance is an essential component to any political activity. The risks of noncompliance involve not only civil and criminal sanctions, but also reputational harm and bad publicity.
May 23, 2012 at 05:00 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It should be apparent from our series on political activities (participating in politics, super PACs, pay-to-play, corporate law restrictions, lobbying disclosure) that compliance is an essential component to any political activity. The risks of noncompliance involve not only civil and criminal sanctions, but also reputational harm and bad publicity. Loss of reputation may hinder or even reverse successes in the legislative and political sphere.
The compliance plan
A good compliance plan will be comprehensive, easy to follow and easy to monitor. No one model is perfect for every company or organization, but the following are key components to a successful plan.
1. Draft and disseminate simple and clear policies on political activities that:
- Explain the company's policy on political contributions and other political activity
- Prohibit the use of corporate facilities and staff in connection with personal volunteer political activity, unless authorized and permitted by law
- Restrict employees from lobbying unless specifically authorized to do so
- Prohibit giving impermissible gifts
- Require political contributions to be pre-cleared if the company is subject to pay-to-play rules
- Prohibit coercion of political contributions
2. Provide regular training and updates to officers and employees involved in government affairs, compliance and others who may interact from time to time with government officials.
3. Develop a central calendar of all report due dates for lobbying and political giving. Include not only the dates the reports are due, but also dates on which drafts are to be prepared and all of the steps for sign-off on the reports. This will leave plenty of time for accurate and timely reports.
4. Develop a central file for all lobbying contracts, and be certain they have obligations for the lobbyist to file all reports, share all reports with the company before they are filed, and comply with all applicable gift and ethics rules (note: many states prohibit contingency fee contracts for legislative services).
5. Determine who will be responsible for signing off on and answering questions about decisions to:
- Hire outside lobbyists
- Authorize internal employees to lobby
- Disburse corporate funds for political contributions
- Disburse corporate funds for trade associations, social welfare organizations and charities
- Donate to independent expenditure committees such as super PACs
- Make statements about legislation that will impact the company
- Engage in grassroots advocacy with customers, employees or the public
6. Determine who will be responsible for filing lobbying reports and implement appropriate tracking mechanisms to compile the relevant data.
7. Ensure that the tax department is aware of all legislative and political activities so that those costs are treated as nondeductible.
8. Clearly delineate the restricted class of individuals eligible for PAC membership or to participate in other political activities.
9. Track lobbying and political costs accurately and simply (this includes association memberships, travel to Washington, D.C., for legislative visits, outside lobbyist fees and other similar expenses).
10. Track employee time for those employees engaged in lobbying activities.
11. Don't forget your outside consultants. As your agents, it is important that they understand the company's rules regarding political activity and gifts.
12. Instill a culture of asking first. For example, for site visits or invitations to receptions or charitable fundraising events, there is often a right way to accomplish your goals. But because gift rules can be very technical and specific, it is important to review planned activity even before extending an invitation.
Other considerations in a plan
PAC:If the organization has a political action committee, it should develop bylaws that provide a structure of governance for the PAC. Some PACs allow a single individual or small group to decide how the PAC will distribute its funds, and others have a more robust governing committee to make those decisions. Regardless of the model, it should work with the company's government affairs team to support those efforts and not run counter to them. Even if the company is not planning to make many contributions, creating a PAC can give the company flexibility to pay for fundraising events.
If the PAC is active at the state level, then, depending on the state, it likely will have to register and report in that state (or at the very least, file its Federal Election Committee reports with the state).
Contributions:If the organization makes direct corporate contributions in state elections, then it must determine who gets to decide to whom to contribute. This could involve the PAC committee or other senior management. The company should have appropriate controls in place to make certain that an employee will not authorize a contribution that might embarrass the company. Also, remember to monitor in-kind contributions, such as catering for fundraising events and use of corporate offices for political activity.
Interactions with officials:Companies that interact with consumers may find themselves interacting with candidates and political officials outside of the lobbying or political sphere. They must be careful to avoid giving inadvertent gifts to officials subject to gift limitations. For example, hotels cannot simply comp rooms for elected officials, wireless phone companies cannot give phones to campaigns and so forth.
Senior management: Interacting with the government may involve senior management in two different ways.
- They may be called upon to meet with elected officials and to help lobbying for a company's positions. This is permissible, but those individuals need to understand the rules, and they will likely have to track their time and expenses for lobbying purposes. Beware that some states now regulate “goodwill lobbying,” which applies to efforts to cultivate relationships with officials regardless of whether specific legislation or other matters are even discussed.
- Contributions to candidates or third-party groups may raise the company's profile, and senior management should be kept briefed on those expenditures and contributions.
Although there has been criticism of corporate legislative and political activities recently, it is simply a fact of life that many organizations will have to be engaged with the government and politicians. Doing so requires careful planning and compliance to avoid running afoul of the many restrictions and disclosure obligations imposed by state and federal campaign finance, lobbying disclosure and gift and ethics rules.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Tech Is Cozying Up to President Trump. Here's Why Their Lawyers Are Cautiously Optimistic
Starbucks Hands New CLO Hefty Raise, Says He Fosters 'Environment of Courage and Joy'
Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute readMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Trending Stories
- 15th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21
- 2Commonwealth Court Overturns Zoning Board’s Denial Based on Merger Doctrine and Unnecessary Hardship Questions
- 3De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 2
- 4Being a Profession is Not Malarkey
- 5Bring NJ's 'Pretrial Opportunity Program' into the Open
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250