Gupta’s lawyer suggests others leaked info on P&G
Now a little more than a week into Rajat Guptas insider trading trial, things are really starting to percolate.
May 30, 2012 at 07:52 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Now a little more than a week into Rajat Gupta's insider trading trial, things are really starting to percolate.
Gupta, the former director of Procter & Gamble Co. (P&G) and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and the centerpiece of the U.S. government's recent efforts to curb insider trading, is accused of passing tips to former hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam.
Arrested last October, Gupta has pleaded not guilty and asserts that the government's evidence is circumstantial.
The discussions on day six of what is expected to be a three-week trial centered on P&G's sale of its Folgers coffee unit to J.M. Smucker Co., which was formally announced on June 4, 2008. Gupta's attorney, Gary Naftalis, suggested in his questioning of P&G Chief Financial Officer Jon Moeller that it was possible news of the Folgers deal leaked out through some of the many lawyers, investment bankers, external-relations advisers and corporate tax specialists who worked on the transaction.
“So there were all of these people working on the transaction in addition to the Smucker's people, true?” Naftalis asked Moeller, who responded: “Yes, that's true.”
Prosecutors also alleged yesterday that Gupta called Rajaratnam the day before P&G announced its quarterly earnings in January 2009, telling him that P&G expected organic sales growth of 2 percent to 5 percent for the fiscal year. This was less than what was previously disclosed to the market.
Last week, jurors heard testimony from Rajaratnam's former assistant Caryn Eisenberg, who said that Rajaratnam received a call about Goldman just before Berkshire Hathaway invested $5 billion in the bank. Although Eisenberg recognized the caller's voice, she could not definitively recognize him as Gupta.
Gupta argued that senior Goldman salesman David Loeb was the one who passed the illegal information to Rajaratnam. Loeb, who has not been charged, tipped Rajaratnam about Intel Corp., Apple Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co., according to Gupta's camp.
Rajaratnam, once the head of Galleon Group, currently is serving an 11-year prison term for conspiracy and securities fraud.
Read more about yesterday's events from Reuters and the Wall Street Journal.
For more from InsideCounsel on Gupta's trial and tribulations, read:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'We’re Here to Empower People to Make Good Decisions': Why Compliance Chiefs Must Learn to Think Like a Businessperson
High-Flying Genetics Testing Firm GeneDx Hires Ex-Zoetis GC as Legal Chief
2 minute readWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Corporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
- 2Goodwin, Polsinelli, Fox Rothschild Find New Phila. Offices
- 3Helping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
- 4How GC-of-Year Sam Khichi Has Helped CVS Barrel Through Challenges
- 5A Website is Not a ‘Place.’ What Took So Long To Get This Right?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250