YouTube prevails in French copyright lawsuit
A week after its courtroom triumph over Oracle Corp., Google has scored an international victory against French television broadcaster TF1.
May 30, 2012 at 08:27 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A week after its courtroom triumph over Oracle Corp., Google has scored an international victory against French television broadcaster TF1. The channel sued Google-owned YouTube for copyright infringement in March 2008, arguing that the video hosting site was liable for TF1 programs posted by users.
A French court rejected these charges Tuesday, ruling that, as a hosting service, “the defendant is not responsible in principle for the video content on its site; only the users of the site are.” To add insult to injury, the broadcaster—which sought $175 million in damages—will have to pay nearly $100,000 in Google's legal fees.
Christophe Muller, head of YouTube partnerships in Southern Europe, the Middle East and Africa, lauded the decision in a blog post. “The verdict demonstrates how the Internet is enriching French culture,” he wrote. “By embracing the Web, this verdict moves France a step forward to further benefit from (the) Internet's massive economic and cultural opportunity.”
The decision is just the most recent in a string of copyright complaints against the online video service. In April, a German court was less forgiving than its French counterpart, ordering the site to install filtering software to keep users from uploading infringing material.
YouTube has also faced litigation stateside, notably in the form of a long-running copyright battle with Viacom Inc. In 2010, U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton ruled that the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act protected YouTube from liability, provided that the site removed copyrighted videos after receiving takedown notices. But the 2nd Circuit revived the lawsuit last month when it returned the case to a lower court.
Read more on the verdict from PC Magazine.
A week after its courtroom triumph over
A French court rejected these charges Tuesday, ruling that, as a hosting service, “the defendant is not responsible in principle for the video content on its site; only the users of the site are.” To add insult to injury, the broadcaster—which sought $175 million in damages—will have to pay nearly $100,000 in
Christophe Muller, head of YouTube partnerships in Southern Europe, the Middle East and Africa, lauded the decision in a blog post. “The verdict demonstrates how the Internet is enriching French culture,” he wrote. “By embracing the Web, this verdict moves France a step forward to further benefit from (the) Internet's massive economic and cultural opportunity.”
The decision is just the most recent in a string of copyright complaints against the online video service. In April, a German court was less forgiving than its French counterpart, ordering the site to install filtering software to keep users from uploading infringing material.
YouTube has also faced litigation stateside, notably in the form of a long-running copyright battle with
Read more on the verdict from PC Magazine.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute read
Old Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
