Bankruptcy lawyers reject increased DOJ oversight of fees
Bankrupt companies may have to fear their lawyers more than their creditors, at least according to Department of Justice (DOJ) officials.
June 05, 2012 at 07:56 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Bankrupt companies may have to fear their lawyers more than their creditors, at least according to Department of Justice (DOJ) officials.
Members of the agency's U.S. Trustee Program convened a public meeting Monday to discuss proposed guidelines that would increase government oversight of Chapter 11 filings by companies with more than $50 million in assets. Under the new rules, law firms working these cases would have to disclose their Chapter 11 billing rates and fee applications, stop rounding up billable hours and work within preset budgets.
Government officials contend that bankruptcy lawyers charge higher fees than other attorneys—sometimes in excess of $1,000 an hour—because their clients are less apt to negotiate discounts. Those hourly rates can add up to some serious cash: Weil, Gotshal & Manges pocketed $383 million during Lehman Brothers' restructuring, for instance, and Hughes Hubbard & Reed has netted $17 million in the first four months of MF Global's bankruptcy.
The DOJ also examined whether law firms justify exorbitant rates by devoting unnecessary hours and personnel to bankruptcy cases.
For their part, law firms have come up with multiple arguments against the proposed regulations. Some worry that increased disclosure of billing practices could violate attorney-client privilege. Others argue that the new rules would lead to excessive administrative costs. Cravath, Swaine & Moore partner Richard Levin predicts that law firms may ultimately provide the government with inaccurate data, telling officials that “lawyers are notoriously bad at administrative tasks, including putting data in properly.”
Read more about the meeting at Reuters.
Bankrupt companies may have to fear their lawyers more than their creditors, at least according to Department of Justice (DOJ) officials.
Members of the agency's U.S. Trustee Program convened a public meeting Monday to discuss proposed guidelines that would increase government oversight of Chapter 11 filings by companies with more than $50 million in assets. Under the new rules, law firms working these cases would have to disclose their Chapter 11 billing rates and fee applications, stop rounding up billable hours and work within preset budgets.
Government officials contend that bankruptcy lawyers charge higher fees than other attorneys—sometimes in excess of $1,000 an hour—because their clients are less apt to negotiate discounts. Those hourly rates can add up to some serious cash:
The DOJ also examined whether law firms justify exorbitant rates by devoting unnecessary hours and personnel to bankruptcy cases.
For their part, law firms have come up with multiple arguments against the proposed regulations. Some worry that increased disclosure of billing practices could violate attorney-client privilege. Others argue that the new rules would lead to excessive administrative costs.
Read more about the meeting at Reuters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anticompetitive Practices, Fees
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250