Rolls-Royce faces whistleblower suit
U.S. District Judge William Lawrence decided on Monday that Rolls-Royce Corp. must face a whistleblower lawsuit. Judge Lawrence ruled that plaintiffs Thomas McArtor and Keith Ramsey, both former Rolls-Royce quality control offices, could move forward on two of their four liability theories.
June 06, 2012 at 07:33 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
U.S. District Judge William Lawrence decided on Monday that Rolls-Royce Corp. must face a whistleblower lawsuit. Judge Lawrence ruled that plaintiffs Thomas McArtor and Keith Ramsey, both former Rolls-Royce quality control offices, could move forward on two of their four liability theories.
The plaintiffs allege that the airline engine manufacturer cheated the U.S. government when it failed to report defense contract product defects.
McArtor and Ramsey say Rolls-Royce induced the U.S. to enter into about 180 aircraft engine contracts between 2003 and 2006 by failing to disclose defects and hiding those practices to sustain third-party certification that was necessary to retain existing contracts and gain new ones. The pair also claimed that Rolls-Royce concealed its failure to comply with a required quality assurance plan.
Judge Lawrence, however, rejected the plaintiffs theory that Rolls-Royce could be liable for reverse false claims for allegedly failing to disclose defects to the U.S. in order to skirt refunds or issue replacement parts, saying the plaintiffs offered little more than conjecture.
The lawsuit, which the plaintiffs filed in 2008, was unsealed in 2010 after the U.S. declined to intervene.
The complaint details that thousands of military aircraft engines are potentially affected by Rolls-Royce's alleged subterfuge, including the F-35 joint-strike fighter plane, C-130 Hercules transport and the V-22 Osprey.
McArtor and Ramsey, who are suing on behalf of the U.S., seek an $11,000 penalty for each false claim and each false statement the company made to the Defense Department, plus three times the amount of payments received or costs avoided. They also are seeking 30 percent of any such recovery for themselves.
Both plaintiffs claim they were terminated as a result of their disapproval with the company's quality control measures. McArtor, who was employed from 1994 to 2006, says he was pushed out after reporting misconduct. Ramsey, who worked from 2002 to 2006, claims he was fired after refusing to cooperate with quality control plan changes.
For more on the story, read Bloomberg.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250