Costner v. Baldwin

It could have been a real-life Hollywood story—two celebrities joining forces to clean up a devastating oil spill. Instead, the one-time partnership between Kevin Costner and Stephen Baldwin has soured into a bitter, multimillion-dollar courtroom battle.

Baldwin and his friend Spyridon Contogouris were investors in Costner's company—Ocean Therapy Solutions (OTS)—before selling their shares for $1.4 million and $500,000, respectively. Shortly after their exodus, British Petroleum (BP) reportedly paid OTS more than $52 million for 32 oil separation centrifuges intended to clean up after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Baldwin and Contogouris sued Costner for $21 million in damages, claiming that he cheated them out of substantial profits by allowing them to sell their stock without informing them of the impending BP deal.

Costner later countersued, saying he was “surprised and offended by the idea that Contogouris and Baldwin would walk away from OTS with almost $2 million in cash despite having invested no money in the company…” Both stars are expected to testify in the trial, which began June 4.

Ruined Reputation

You wouldn't think that a man who willingly goes by the moniker “Johnny Bananas” would be overly concerned about his good name. But the former MTV reality star—whose real name is John Devenanzio—sued HBO last year, claiming the producers of the network's hit show “Entourage” had tarnished his reputation and caused him “tremendous emotional distress” when they introduced the character of a cartoon gorilla named “Johnny Bananas.” Devenanzio sought compensatory and punitive damages and an injunction against any episodes featuring the character. HBO countered that nicknames are not protected under New York law and that there was no connection between Devenanzio and an animated ape.

The colorful case eventually ended in a less-than-dramatic fashion when a judge recently ruled that Devenanzio had failed to file the suit before the one-year statute of limitations expired.

Family Feud

On Wednesday, a California judge ended a contentious family feud between Leighton Meester and her mother, Constance, by delivering a default judgment in favor of the “Gossip Girl” star. The younger Meester first filed suit in July 2011, claiming that she sent her family $7,500 a month to pay for her younger brother's medical expenses, but that Constance instead spent the money on Botox, hair extensions and plastic surgery.

Constance fired back with a $3 million lawsuit, arguing that she had “sacrificed her happiness” to further Leighton's acting career and that Leighton had broken an agreement to return the favor with $10,000 a month in support payments. But a Los Angeles judge ruled this week that no enforceable agreement existed between the two, and that Constance had failed to properly respond to her daughter's original lawsuit.