Webcomic writer raises money for charity in response to ridiculous lawsuit
Matthew Inman, the twisted, brilliant mind behind the webcomic The Oatmeal, has come up with perhaps the most twisted and brilliant response to a lawsuit ever: raising $100,000 for charity.
June 13, 2012 at 07:31 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Matthew Inman, the twisted, brilliant mind behind the webcomic The Oatmeal (see here and here to get an idea if you're unfamiliar), has come up with perhaps the most twisted and brilliant response to a lawsuit ever: raising $100,000 for charity.
If this doesn't make any sense, perhaps it's because the lawsuit itself doesn't make much sense either. It all began when Inman discovered that the website FunnyJunk.com was reposting his comics, without attribution, and making advertising money from them. He wrote a post about this, and Funnyjunk responded by emailing its users saying that The Oatmeal had threatened it with a lawsuit.
“I never had plans to sue FunnyJunk and get it shut down; I just wanted my stolen comics removed,” Inman wrote.
The dispute fizzled out eventually, with no legal action taken, until a year later, when FunnyJunk threatened Inman with a federal lawsuit unless he agreed to pay $20,000 in damages … to repay them for hosting his unlicensed comics?
“I don't want to get tied up in courtroom nonsense,” Inman wrote, and posted the letter from FunnyJunk online for all to see, along with a list of all The Oatmeal comics that were still up on the site. FunnyJunk has since removed these comics.
“I have a better idea,” he wrote. Rather than paying the $20,000 FunnyJunk demanded, “I'm going to try and raise $20,000 in donations. I'm going to take a photo of the raised money. I'm going to mail you that photo, along with this drawing of your mom seducing a Kodiak bear. I'm going to take the money and donate one-half to the National Wildlife Federation and the other half to the American Cancer Society.”
He called the endeavor “Operation BearLove Good Cancer Bad,” and wrote “consider this my philanthropic, kind-spirited way of saying 'F— off.'” In approximately one hour, Inman had already raised the $20,000, and one day later, donations exceeded $100,000.
FunnyJunk's lawyer, Charles Carreon, told MSNBC that he didn't believe FunnyJunk's demands were unreasonable. “I'm completely unfamiliar really with this style of responding to a legal threat — I've never really seen it before,” he said. “I don't like seeing anyone referring to my mother as a sexual deviant.”
Matthew Inman, the twisted, brilliant mind behind the webcomic The Oatmeal (see here and here to get an idea if you're unfamiliar), has come up with perhaps the most twisted and brilliant response to a lawsuit ever: raising $100,000 for charity.
If this doesn't make any sense, perhaps it's because the lawsuit itself doesn't make much sense either. It all began when Inman discovered that the website FunnyJunk.com was reposting his comics, without attribution, and making advertising money from them. He wrote a post about this, and Funnyjunk responded by emailing its users saying that The Oatmeal had threatened it with a lawsuit.
“I never had plans to sue FunnyJunk and get it shut down; I just wanted my stolen comics removed,” Inman wrote.
The dispute fizzled out eventually, with no legal action taken, until a year later, when FunnyJunk threatened Inman with a federal lawsuit unless he agreed to pay $20,000 in damages … to repay them for hosting his unlicensed comics?
“I don't want to get tied up in courtroom nonsense,” Inman wrote, and posted the letter from FunnyJunk online for all to see, along with
“I have a better idea,” he wrote. Rather than paying the $20,000 FunnyJunk demanded, “I'm going to try and raise $20,000 in donations. I'm going to take a photo of the raised money. I'm going to mail you that photo, along with this drawing of your mom seducing a Kodiak bear. I'm going to take the money and donate one-half to the National Wildlife Federation and the other half to the American Cancer Society.”
He called the endeavor “Operation BearLove Good Cancer Bad,” and wrote “consider this my philanthropic, kind-spirited way of saying 'F— off.'” In approximately one hour, Inman had already raised the $20,000, and one day later, donations exceeded $100,000.
FunnyJunk's lawyer, Charles Carreon, told MSNBC that he didn't believe FunnyJunk's demands were unreasonable. “I'm completely unfamiliar really with this style of responding to a legal threat — I've never really seen it before,” he said. “I don't like seeing anyone referring to my mother as a sexual deviant.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Puts Beat Down on Ex-Wrestling CEO Vince McMahon for Not Reporting Settlements
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250