Technology: The promises and perils of the cloud
While cloud-based services can provide flexible, cost-effective technology solutions that can be quickly and easily implemented, moving into the cloud comes with significant risks, including the loss of control over sensitive data and critical information systems.
June 15, 2012 at 05:00 AM
11 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
While cloud-based services can provide flexible, cost-effective technology solutions that can be quickly and easily implemented, moving into the cloud comes with significant risks, including the loss of control over sensitive data and critical information systems. Before jumping into the cloud, it is important to understand some of the most significant risks, along with ways companies can mitigate and manage them.
Why move to the cloud?
While the term “cloud computing” broadly encompasses the provision of software, storage, data access and other computational services on demand over any computer network, it is most commonly used to refer to a public cloud in which a customer has the ability to access online resources on demand, from a third-party provider over the Internet.
Because the cloud is actually a hybrid technology solution combining software, hardware and services, the terms and conditions governing the customer-provider relationship are a mixture of legal and commercial terms and conditions from license agreements and technology services agreements. These complex agreements must be crafted carefully in order to avoid or mitigate the risks inherent therein.
Data privacy and security risks and regulations
Using cloud services often requires a company to disclose sensitive information, such as the personal information of its customers or personnel, to the cloud provider for storage or processing. The unauthorized disclosure, loss or destruction of sensitive data can have particularly severe consequences, including the significant costs of recovering that data and notifying affected individuals of the breach.
In fact, a recent SEC Division of Corporate Finance Disclosure Guidance (Oct. 23, 2011) describes one SEC division's views on the adverse consequences and related disclosure obligations relating to cybersecurity risks and incidents. Before providing any information to a cloud provider, in-house counsel should conduct due diligence to ensure that the provider is capable of safeguarding the information and put the related contractual provisions in place.
Contractual mechanisms for managing risk
There are a variety of contractual protections that in-house counsel can use to manage data privacy and security risks, and to stipulate the responses required if a breach occurs. These measures are important not only as a good business practice, but also to comply with an ever-growing body of federal and state laws regulating the privacy and security of certain types of information.
A contract that involves the transfer of sensitive data to a cloud provider should require the provider to comply not only with all applicable laws, but also with any industry and/or state law standards for data security. Contracts also should stipulate that the provider maintain appropriate protections against the loss or destruction of data and identify the party who will bear the costs of remedying a data breach. Unless these issues are addressed clearly in the contract, it may be difficult to be made whole in the event of a breach.
Counsel also should consider contractually requiring cloud providers to supply an annual Type II audit report under the new Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16. These audit standards address the adequacy of a service provider's internal controls, including whether the controls are suitably designed to protect an organization and its data.
Availability and performance
In moving to a cloud solution, a company may virtually hand over control of its critical IT functions to the provider. As a result, the provider is responsible for keeping the cloud solution up and running, and the availability of the solution is largely outside of the customer's control. Except in unusual circumstances, agreements should include an availability commitment by the provider describing when the cloud service will be available for use.
Termination and suspension rights
In the event of a dispute between the company and the provider, the company's most valuable asset, its data, is at the mercy of the provider. If the provider pulls the plug on the services or refuses to allow access to data, a company may not be able to run its business. Some important protections to incorporate into a cloud agreement include:
- Rights to terminate for cause and convenience
- Cure periods to allow breaches to be cured before services may be terminated
- Rights to access and retrieve data at any time during and after the agreement
The bottom line is that a company should be able to continue to run its business while a dispute is being resolved, and obtain the assistance it needs to move to another provider if necessary.
Using insurance to manage risk
Insurance, including cyber-liability coverage, presents yet another opportunity for companies to manage privacy and data security risks. A company and its cloud providers should maintain appropriate insurance to cover:
- Losses from a data security breach
- Costs to change account numbers
- Lost business income
- Data restoration expenses
- Payments to third parties that are required as a result of a breach
Such insurance should also address potential costs and liabilities related to lawsuits from customers, employees, banks, retail stores and other third parties, or expenses related to investigations brought by regulatory agencies.
Looking before leaping
Moving to the cloud may raise new issues for companies accustomed to traditional software licensing. It pays to give careful consideration to all the issues before moving into the cloud. By understanding of the nature of cloud solutions, the risks they pose and the ways to mitigate these risks, in-house counsel can help their companies sensibly take advantage of all that the cloud has to offer.
While cloud-based services can provide flexible, cost-effective technology solutions that can be quickly and easily implemented, moving into the cloud comes with significant risks, including the loss of control over sensitive data and critical information systems. Before jumping into the cloud, it is important to understand some of the most significant risks, along with ways companies can mitigate and manage them.
Why move to the cloud?
While the term “cloud computing” broadly encompasses the provision of software, storage, data access and other computational services on demand over any computer network, it is most commonly used to refer to a public cloud in which a customer has the ability to access online resources on demand, from a third-party provider over the Internet.
Because the cloud is actually a hybrid technology solution combining software, hardware and services, the terms and conditions governing the customer-provider relationship are a mixture of legal and commercial terms and conditions from license agreements and technology services agreements. These complex agreements must be crafted carefully in order to avoid or mitigate the risks inherent therein.
Data privacy and security risks and regulations
Using cloud services often requires a company to disclose sensitive information, such as the personal information of its customers or personnel, to the cloud provider for storage or processing. The unauthorized disclosure, loss or destruction of sensitive data can have particularly severe consequences, including the significant costs of recovering that data and notifying affected individuals of the breach.
In fact, a recent SEC Division of Corporate Finance Disclosure Guidance (Oct. 23, 2011) describes one SEC division's views on the adverse consequences and related disclosure obligations relating to cybersecurity risks and incidents. Before providing any information to a cloud provider, in-house counsel should conduct due diligence to ensure that the provider is capable of safeguarding the information and put the related contractual provisions in place.
Contractual mechanisms for managing risk
There are a variety of contractual protections that in-house counsel can use to manage data privacy and security risks, and to stipulate the responses required if a breach occurs. These measures are important not only as a good business practice, but also to comply with an ever-growing body of federal and state laws regulating the privacy and security of certain types of information.
A contract that involves the transfer of sensitive data to a cloud provider should require the provider to comply not only with all applicable laws, but also with any industry and/or state law standards for data security. Contracts also should stipulate that the provider maintain appropriate protections against the loss or destruction of data and identify the party who will bear the costs of remedying a data breach. Unless these issues are addressed clearly in the contract, it may be difficult to be made whole in the event of a breach.
Counsel also should consider contractually requiring cloud providers to supply an annual Type II audit report under the new Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 16. These audit standards address the adequacy of a service provider's internal controls, including whether the controls are suitably designed to protect an organization and its data.
Availability and performance
In moving to a cloud solution, a company may virtually hand over control of its critical IT functions to the provider. As a result, the provider is responsible for keeping the cloud solution up and running, and the availability of the solution is largely outside of the customer's control. Except in unusual circumstances, agreements should include an availability commitment by the provider describing when the cloud service will be available for use.
Termination and suspension rights
In the event of a dispute between the company and the provider, the company's most valuable asset, its data, is at the mercy of the provider. If the provider pulls the plug on the services or refuses to allow access to data, a company may not be able to run its business. Some important protections to incorporate into a cloud agreement include:
- Rights to terminate for cause and convenience
- Cure periods to allow breaches to be cured before services may be terminated
- Rights to access and retrieve data at any time during and after the agreement
The bottom line is that a company should be able to continue to run its business while a dispute is being resolved, and obtain the assistance it needs to move to another provider if necessary.
Using insurance to manage risk
Insurance, including cyber-liability coverage, presents yet another opportunity for companies to manage privacy and data security risks. A company and its cloud providers should maintain appropriate insurance to cover:
- Losses from a data security breach
- Costs to change account numbers
- Lost business income
- Data restoration expenses
- Payments to third parties that are required as a result of a breach
Such insurance should also address potential costs and liabilities related to lawsuits from customers, employees, banks, retail stores and other third parties, or expenses related to investigations brought by regulatory agencies.
Looking before leaping
Moving to the cloud may raise new issues for companies accustomed to traditional software licensing. It pays to give careful consideration to all the issues before moving into the cloud. By understanding of the nature of cloud solutions, the risks they pose and the ways to mitigate these risks, in-house counsel can help their companies sensibly take advantage of all that the cloud has to offer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250