Judge to hear arguments in Apple patent case against Motorola Mobility
A turning point may be on the horizon for Apples patent war against Googles Android smartphone operating system.
June 20, 2012 at 07:30 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A turning point may be on the horizon for Apple's patent war against Google's Android smartphone operating system. An important hearing is taking place today in Chicago, where Judge Richard Posner will consider Apple's argument that it should be allowed to seek an order that bars the sale of some smartphones made by Motorola Mobility.
Apple has long contended that the Android operating system infringes its intellectual property. The company's previous CEO Steve Jobs is on the record accusing Google of “grand theft.”
Even though Apple is well-known to be in the warpath, it was actually Motorola who struck first in this particular battle, suing the iPhone maker in October 2010. Apple quickly fired back with its own claims.
A lot is riding on Posner's decision. A favorable ruling for Apple would mean the company could negotiate advantageous licensing agreements in its fight against Motorola as well as in legal battles with other competitors such as Samsung.
In pretrial rulings, Posner dismissed most of Motorola's patent claims, and allowed more of Apple's claims to stand. Things were looking good for Apple going into the trial, which was set to start last week, before Posner canceled it, saying neither side could prove damages.
Even so, Posner granted Apple's request for today's hearing on a potential injunction. Motorola may also request an injunction against Apple for the one patent claim that it has left in the race.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of Apple's patent wars, see below:
Steve Jobs' quotes allowed in Apple-Google patent trial
Apple gains ground in patent suit against Google's mobile operating system
iPad trademark battle continues in China
Apple asks judge's permission to sue bankrupt Kodak for patent infringement
A turning point may be on the horizon for
Even though
A lot is riding on Posner's decision. A favorable ruling for
In pretrial rulings, Posner dismissed most of Motorola's patent claims, and allowed more of
Even so, Posner granted
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of
Steve Jobs' quotes allowed in Apple-Google patent trial
iPad trademark battle continues in China
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250