Rite Aid will pay $20.9 million to settle overtime suit
A decade of litigation against Rite Aid Corp. is finally ending.
June 20, 2012 at 06:32 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A decade of litigation against Rite Aid Corp. is finally ending.
The third-largest drugstore chain yesterday agreed to pay up to $20.9 million to settle allegations dating back to 2002 that it violated wage and hour labor laws.
Plaintiffs in 15 wage and hour collective actions and class actions comprising Rite Aid assistant managers and co-managers accused the retailer of misclassifying them and failing to pay them overtime wages for working more than 40 hours a week.
A court still must approve the proposed agreement, which would cover more than 6,000 current and former Rite Aid associates.
In a statement, Rite Aid denied any wrongdoing and said it believes its previous classification of assistant managers and co-managers was lawful.
Read the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg for more about information.
A decade of litigation against Rite Aid Corp. is finally ending.
The third-largest drugstore chain yesterday agreed to pay up to $20.9 million to settle allegations dating back to 2002 that it violated wage and hour labor laws.
Plaintiffs in 15 wage and hour collective actions and class actions comprising Rite Aid assistant managers and co-managers accused the retailer of misclassifying them and failing to pay them overtime wages for working more than 40 hours a week.
A court still must approve the proposed agreement, which would cover more than 6,000 current and former Rite Aid associates.
In a statement, Rite Aid denied any wrongdoing and said it believes its previous classification of assistant managers and co-managers was lawful.
Read the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg for more about information.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
4 minute readMeta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-99
- 4Decision of the Day: NYPD Officer's Sexual Assault of Informant Occurred Outside Scope of Employment
- 5'Not the President's Personal Lawyer': Lawyers Share Concerns Over How AG Pick Bondi’s Loyalism to Trump May Impact DOJ
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250