Law school applicants value school rankings over job placement rates
Given that fresh-faced law school grads are facing the worst job market in 18 years, you might think pre-law students would be dissuaded from stepping into the breach. Apparently not.
June 21, 2012 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Given that fresh-faced law school grads are facing the worst job market in 18 years, you might think pre-law students would be dissuaded from stepping into the breach. Apparently not.
Kaplan Test Prep released its 2012 survey on Tuesday on how prospective law students are selecting their law schools, and found that the paucity of jobs has not really influenced those decisions. In the two years since the previous study, Kaplan found that pre-law students continue to place a much higher value on where a law school stands in the rankings than on how many of its graduates land legal jobs.
When asked “What is most important to you when picking a law school to apply to?”, 32 percent of respondents cited a law school's ranking; followed by geographic location (22 percent); academic programming (20 percent); and affordability/tuition (13 percent). Interestingly, only 8 percent of respondents were most concerned with a law school's job placement statistics.
These factors ranked in the same order in the October 2010 survey, but a school's ranking increased in importance in the 2012 survey.
Kaplan also asked, “How important a factor is a law school's ranking in determining where you will apply?” Eighty-six percent of respondents said that ranking is “very important” or “somewhat important” in deciding where to apply, which is the same exact percentage as the October 2010 survey.
As for where pre-law students hoped to eventually hang their hats, 38 percent said they hoped to chase the big bucks by working in Big Law, and 31 percent responded that they wanted to go into public interest law. There was a three-way tie among other options, with 23 percent saying they wanted to work for boutique firms, another 23 percent saying they wanted to use their JDs to go into politics at some point and a separate 23 percent responding that they wanted to use their degrees for business purposes.
Coincidentally, these career desires closely mirror what respondents told Kaplan when asked the same question in the October 2010 survey.
“While it may seem counterintuitive that pre-law students aren't placing greater importance on a school's job placement stats, most applicants know that there is a direct correlation between where a student graduates from, their starting salary and career prospects, which is likely why rankings are consistently the most important consideration by far,” Jeff Thomas, director of pre-law programs, Kaplan Test Prep, said in a release. “But with some law schools cutting their number of seats and the job market tight, pre-law students may have to think more strategically now.” The American Bar Association recently noted that the only about 8 percent of 2011 law school grads were picked up by law firms with more than 250 attorneys. Following up on those figures, the Wall Street Journal yesterday ranked the top 25 law schools based on the percentage of 2011 grads who landed long-term positions at firms with more than 250 attorneys.
The top 25 schools in order of percentage of graduates who landed Big Law roles are:
- Columbia University (59%)
- University of Pennsylvania (53%)
- Northwestern University (48%)
- Harvard University (46%)
- University of Chicago (44%)
- Stanford University (43%)
- New York University (42%)
- (tie) Duke University & University of California-Berkeley (38%)
- Cornell University (35%)
- University of Virginia (33%)
- University of Southern California (31%)
- Georgetown University (30%)
- Yale University (29%)
- University of Michigan (29%)
- Vanderbilt University (25%)
- Fordham University (22%)
- University of Texas at Austin (21%)
- University of California-Los Angeles (20%)
- Boston College (19%)
- George Washington University (18%)
- Boston University (16%)
- Emory University (15%)
- Washington University (14%)
- University of Washington (12%)
For more details on the ranking, read the Wall Street Journal.
For more on Kaplan's survey, click here.
And for more from InsideCounsel on law school job placement and careers, read:
2011 law school grads face worst job market in 18 years
Law school debt estimates exceed $200,000 for class of 2015
New York to require aspiring lawyers to complete pro bono work
Judge tosses suit against New York Law School for misleading jobs data
20 more law schools to be sued for misleading jobs data
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
Companies' Obsession With Soft Skills Has Made Prized GC Posts Even Harder to Land
4 minute readMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Private Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
Trending Stories
- 1Bar Groups Say IOLA Settlement Protects Civil Litigants' Fund From Future 'Raids'
- 2'Every MAGA Will Buy It:' Elon Musk Featured in Miami Crypto Lawsuit
- 3Pennsylvania Law Schools Are Seeing Double-Digit Boosts in 2025 Applications
- 4Meta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
- 5State Court Rejects Uber's Attempt to Move IP Suit to Latin America
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250