7 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines
The following lawsuits exemplify the lighter, and sometimes bizarre, side of the legal world.
June 27, 2012 at 08:36 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Matchmaking Malfeasance
All's fair in love and war—unless you're a matchmaker allegedly defrauding your clients.
Last January, New Jersey resident Jeanne McCarthy spent $7,000 to sign up for Two of Us matchmaking service, attracted by the company's promise to set her up with at least one pre-screened match every two weeks. Instead, McCarthy says she went on only one date over the course of five months. To make matters worse, “[she] determined that this one date involved a man with three drunk driving convictions and an outstanding criminal warrant in Arizona.”
When Two of Us refused to grant her a refund, McCarthy filed a lawsuit, seeking unspecified compensatory damages and legal costs.
Painful Pitch
When a professional baseball player gets hit by a pitch, he takes first base. When New Jersey resident Elizabeth Lloyd was hit by a pitch, she sued the 11-year-old who threw it. Two years ago, Lloyd was sitting near the fenced-in bullpen where Little League catcher Matthew Migliaccio was helping a pitcher warm up, when she says Migliaccio intentionally threw a ball at her face. Lloyd suffered multiple fractures and underwent surgery following the injury
Now she is seeking more than $150,000 in damages for medical expenses, alleging that Migliaccio was negligent for “engaging in inappropriate physical and/or sporting activity” in her vicinity. Lloyd's husband filed an additional count against the now 13-year-old, claiming the loss of “services, society and consortium” of his wife.
Migliaccio says he accidentally overthrew the ball. His father added that “It's absurd to expect every 11-year-old to throw the ball on target…You assume some risk when you go out to a field. That's just part of being at a game.”
Bathtime Blunder
Eight-year-old boys aren't known for their cleanliness, but one Texas third-grader was allegedly so dirty that school employees resorted to forcibly bathing him. The boy's parents, Amber and Michael Tilley, are suing the school district, claiming that a school nurse and counselor told their son that he “smelled badly, was dirty and had bad hygiene,” then removed his clothes and “began violently washing his body.”
The two deny that their son had poor hygiene, and say he was traumatized by the incident. “He just kept on and on, wanting to take baths,” his mother said. “You know, he just felt so disgusting.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250