Manhattan deli can keep its “heart attack” sandwiches
New Yorkers who enjoy scarfing down massive calorie-laden sandwiches at a famous local kosher deli can rejoice.
July 09, 2012 at 06:42 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
New Yorkers who enjoy scarfing down massive calorie-laden sandwiches at a famous local kosher deli can rejoice.
Manhattan's well-known 2nd Ave Deli sells a $25 culinary creation called the Instant Heart Attack Sandwich, which features layers upon layers of corned beef, pastrami, turkey or salami packed between two potato latkes. Last year, Las Vegas-based Heart Attack Grill threatened to sue the New York deli over the Instant Heart Attack as well as a new sandwich called the Triple Bypass Sandwich that was in the works at the time. According to the Nevada restaurant's cease-and-desist letter, the New York establishment's sandwiches infringed its trademarks for its various heart attack-themed burgers, including the Quadruple Bypass Burger, which features four half-pound beef patties, eight slices of American cheese, a whole tomato and half an onion.
But on Friday, U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer said there were enough differences between the two restaurants' menu items. He gave 2nd Ave Deli the OK to continue selling its Instant Heart Attack sandwich at current and future Manhattan locations, and he also said the deli can advertise the sandwich on its signage. However, he said, the deli can't advertise the Instant Heart Attack sandwich at non-Manhattan locations and can only reference the new Triple Bypass Sandwich on its menu, not on its signage, at current locations.
Additionally, Judge Engelmayer admonished the litigants about using the court system for such a dispute.
“In the event that future quarrels arise, the court strongly encourages the parties to eschew provocative cease-and-desist letters or precipitous lawsuits, and instead to work together to try to resolve their differences cooperatively,” he said.
Read Reuters and the Wall Street Journal for more details on the sandwich squabble.
New Yorkers who enjoy scarfing down massive calorie-laden sandwiches at a famous local kosher deli can rejoice.
Manhattan's well-known 2nd Ave Deli sells a $25 culinary creation called the Instant Heart Attack Sandwich, which features layers upon layers of corned beef, pastrami, turkey or salami packed between two potato latkes. Last year, Las Vegas-based Heart Attack Grill threatened to sue the
But on Friday, U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer said there were enough differences between the two restaurants' menu items. He gave 2nd Ave Deli the OK to continue selling its Instant Heart Attack sandwich at current and future Manhattan locations, and he also said the deli can advertise the sandwich on its signage. However, he said, the deli can't advertise the Instant Heart Attack sandwich at non-Manhattan locations and can only reference the new Triple Bypass Sandwich on its menu, not on its signage, at current locations.
Additionally, Judge Engelmayer admonished the litigants about using the court system for such a dispute.
“In the event that future quarrels arise, the court strongly encourages the parties to eschew provocative cease-and-desist letters or precipitous lawsuits, and instead to work together to try to resolve their differences cooperatively,” he said.
Read Reuters and the Wall Street Journal for more details on the sandwich squabble.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250