Dewey to propose settlement to ex-partners
Dealing with the aftermath hasnt been any more fun than watching the ship sink. New York law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf still has a long way to go before its finished winding down from its May 28 bankruptcy filing.
July 10, 2012 at 08:30 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Dealing with the aftermath hasn't been any more fun than watching the ship sink. New York law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf still has a long way to go before it's finished winding down from its May 28 bankruptcy filing.
The latest bit of drama comes from a report yesterday that Dewey will present some of its former partners with a settlement proposal on Wednesday. The firm has been trying to recover funds from its former attorneys who jumped ship prior to its official demise.
Albert Togut, Dewey's bankruptcy counsel, said in a court hearing yesterday that the firm will offer dollar figures for potential payments by former partners at a meeting tomorrow. It is not yet clear what partners would be asked to return money under the settlement and how much each partner would be asked to pony up.
Dewey may have claims against former partners to whom it promised massive salary guarantees and partners who are seen to have taken value from the firm when they brought their clients with them to other firms.
Despite the news, Ed Weisfelner, a lawyer for Dewey's creditors' committee, told Reuters that Togut was overselling the progress of settlement talks, and that none of the firm's creditor constituencies have approved a dollar figure for a settlement.
“There are a lot of hours between now and Wednesday and hopefully we'll reach some closure,” Weisfelner told Reuters. “I would have thought Dewey would seek approval, a thumbs-up, from its creditor constituencies.”
Dewey has been scrambling to scrape together money for weeks now.
In late June, Dewey's bankruptcy team announced that it would present its former partners, whose earnings are subject to clawbacks, with an outline for how to settle claims with more than 5,000 creditors anxious to recover their money.
As part of the intended plan, partners who agreed to the settlement would be released from any future claims by Dewey's estate and creditors, as well as from other partners. The intent of the latter clause was to promote participation from some of Dewey's former rainmakers, many of whom had lucrative compensation packages or were in prominent positions within the firm and could be in the crosshairs of angry partners who blame them for the firm's failure.
This provision was particularly noteworthy given that the firm's former IP litigation specialist Henry Bunsow leveled the first publicly filed lawsuit from a former partner at five former members of the firm's management team and a slew of people to be named later the week prior to the clawback announcement. In the suit, Bunsow claims they misrepresented Dewey's financial performance and stability in an effort to recruit partners at other firms. He also asserts that the defendants then used the capital brought in by the new talent to pay favored partners and not run the firm. In a particularly scathing section of the complaint, Bunsow says that the firm's management was “running a Ponzi scheme in order to enrich themselves and select partner of the Firm.”
Additionally, last week, the firm announced that it hopes to pay its 52 remaining workers up to $700,000 in bonuses in an effort to keep them happy and stick out however long it will take to finish dismantling what's left of the defunct firm.
Because Dewey cannot afford to lose any more people, it argued before the court that it should be allowed to pay out incentive and retention compensation to its few remaining workers, who comprise billing, collections, IT and HR professionals.
“The employees are integral to the efficient and expeditious wind down of the debtor's affairs,” the firm said last Tuesday in court papers. “Without the continued commitment of these employees, the debtor's ability to complete an orderly liquidation and to make a meaningful distribution to creditors would be severely compromised.”
For more on the proposed settlement, read Reuters.
And for more from InsideCounsel on Dewey, read:
Dewey looks to pay remaining staff $700,000 in bonuses
Dewey's 50 largest account debtors named
Dewey crusades for quick clawback settlement
Former Dewey partner sues management, claims they were “running a Ponzi scheme”
Dewey finally files for bankruptcy
Regulators sue Dewey, Warsaw office transfers to Greenberg Traurig
Dewey's leaders discuss downfall, next steps
Exodus of Dewey attorneys in full effect
Dewey warns employees that firm could shut down
Dewey's potential merger with SNR Denton falls apart
Dewey encourages partners to jump ship
N.Y. prosecutors probe Dewey & LeBoeuf, firm cuts ties with executive
Dewey & LeBoeuf plans to sublease executive floor
Dewey & LeBoeuf hires bankruptcy counsel
12 Dewey & LeBoeuf partners defect to Willkie Farr
Dewey & LeBoeuf overhauls management team amid more defections
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250