Black store managers sue Wet Seal for discrimination
Former employees of Wet Seal Inc. are suing the clothing retailer for racial discrimination, claiming that the store was biased against black managers because they didnt mesh with the image Wet Seal wanted to portray.
July 13, 2012 at 06:42 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Former employees of Wet Seal Inc. are suing the clothing retailer for racial discrimination, claiming that the store was biased against black managers because they didn't mesh with the image Wet Seal wanted to portray. According to the lawsuit, their “brand image” is “blond hair and blue eyes.”
In a statement, Wet Seal responded that it is an equal opportunity employer, Thomson Reuters reports. “We deny any and all allegations of race discrimination and will vigorously defend this matter,” the statement reads.
The suit claims that a Wet Seal senior vice president emailed employees after a tour of several stores in Philadelphia and Maryland: “Store teams – need diversity/African American dominate – huge issue.”
Plaintiffs are seeking class action status on behalf of current and former black managers of Wet Seal stores. They are claiming that the discrimination is company policy, rather than a result of incidents at individual stores, in the hopes of working around the Supreme Court's recent decision in Dukes v. Wal-Mart.
Read more InsideCounsel stories on discrimination lawsuits:
Transgender employees protected under Title VII
Discrimination case against Fried Frank thrown out
Black pilots, supervisors sue United for discrimination
Muslim woman wins discrimination verdict against Southwestern Bell
Former employees of Wet Seal Inc. are suing the clothing retailer for racial discrimination, claiming that the store was biased against black managers because they didn't mesh with the image Wet Seal wanted to portray. According to the lawsuit, their “brand image” is “blond hair and blue eyes.”
In a statement, Wet Seal responded that it is an equal opportunity employer, Thomson Reuters reports. “We deny any and all allegations of race discrimination and will vigorously defend this matter,” the statement reads.
The suit claims that a Wet Seal senior vice president emailed employees after a tour of several stores in Philadelphia and Maryland: “Store teams – need diversity/African American dominate – huge issue.”
Plaintiffs are seeking class action status on behalf of current and former black managers of Wet Seal stores. They are claiming that the discrimination is company policy, rather than a result of incidents at individual stores, in the hopes of working around the Supreme Court's recent decision in Dukes v.
Read more InsideCounsel stories on discrimination lawsuits:
Transgender employees protected under Title VII
Discrimination case against
Black pilots, supervisors sue United for discrimination
Muslim woman wins discrimination verdict against Southwestern Bell
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Starbucks Hands New CLO Hefty Raise, Says He Fosters 'Environment of Courage and Joy'
Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute read
Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Navigating AI Risks: Best Practices for Compliance and Security
- 220 New Judges? Connecticut Could Get Wave of Jurists
- 3Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 4‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
- 5Justice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
