Colorado shooting survivor plans to sue theater, suspect’s doctors and Warner Brothers
A survivor of the Colorado movie theater shootings plans to file the first lawsuit in the wake of the tragedy, and, sure enough, Warner Brothers is among its targets.
July 25, 2012 at 08:52 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A survivor of the Colorado movie theater shootings plans to file the first lawsuit in the wake of the tragedy, and, sure enough, one of its targets is Warner Brothers, the studio behind the latest Batman trilogy.
Torrence Brown Jr., who was in the Century 16 Theater during the shooting, has reportedly hired an attorney to file a suit in the case. Though Brown was not physically injured, he claims he is suffering from extreme trauma after witnessing the death of his friend A.J. Boik, who was shot in the chest.
Brown's lawyer says the suit will target three defendants: the movie theater, for not securing or guarding its emergency door; Holmes' doctors, for allegedly failing to properly monitor his medications; and Warner Bros., for the violence shown in “The Dark Knight Rises.”
Brown could have hard time proving his claims, however. In the past, judges have dismissed similar lawsuits against film and video game makers, ruling that on-screen violence is protected under the First Amendment. Courts have also ruled that the link between fictional and actual violence is too tenuous to justify such claims: After the 1999 Columbine High School massacre, a Colorado judge dismissed a lawsuit against 25 entertainment companies, saying that they could not have foreseen that their products would incite the shooters to violence.
Charges against the theater and Holmes' doctors could also be difficult to prove, according to some experts. To win the first count, Brown would have to show that the theater acted unreasonably and that it anticipated, or should have anticipated, a threat. And his claims against Holmes' doctors could run into trouble, as communications between physicians and their patients are generally considered confidential.
Read more at TMZ.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the Colorado shootings, see:
A survivor of the Colorado movie theater shootings plans to file the first lawsuit in the wake of the tragedy, and, sure enough, one of its targets is Warner Brothers, the studio behind the latest Batman trilogy.
Torrence Brown Jr., who was in the Century 16 Theater during the shooting, has reportedly hired an attorney to file a suit in the case. Though Brown was not physically injured, he claims he is suffering from extreme trauma after witnessing the death of his friend A.J. Boik, who was shot in the chest.
Brown's lawyer says the suit will target three defendants: the movie theater, for not securing or guarding its emergency door; Holmes' doctors, for allegedly failing to properly monitor his medications; and Warner Bros., for the violence shown in “The Dark Knight Rises.”
Brown could have hard time proving his claims, however. In the past, judges have dismissed similar lawsuits against film and video game makers, ruling that on-screen violence is protected under the First Amendment. Courts have also ruled that the link between fictional and actual violence is too tenuous to justify such claims: After the 1999 Columbine High School massacre, a Colorado judge dismissed a lawsuit against 25 entertainment companies, saying that they could not have foreseen that their products would incite the shooters to violence.
Charges against the theater and Holmes' doctors could also be difficult to prove, according to some experts. To win the first count, Brown would have to show that the theater acted unreasonably and that it anticipated, or should have anticipated, a threat. And his claims against Holmes' doctors could run into trouble, as communications between physicians and their patients are generally considered confidential.
Read more at TMZ.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the Colorado shootings, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250