3M sues former law firm for its role in a lawsuit against the company
In late 2010, Covington & Burling dropped 3M Co. as a client. Eight days later, the law firm started work for Minnesotas attorney general, who then filed an environmental lawsuit against none other than 3M.
July 26, 2012 at 08:29 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In late 2010, Covington & Burling dropped 3M Co. as a client. Eight days later, the law firm started work for Minnesota's attorney general, who then filed an environmental lawsuit against none other than 3M.
Unsurprisingly, the technology company wasn't happy with the switch, and is now suing its former firm for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty.
According to 3M's complaint, Covington had advised 3M for decades, often on environmental matters. In the 1980s, the law firm helped 3M defend its food packaging products to the Food & Drug Administration (FDA), and it counseled the company again in the 1990s, when the FDA and Environmental Protection Agency investigated the tech giant's fluorochemical business.
But in December 2010, according to the complaint, Covington partner Seth Safra sought to terminate the firm's involvement with 3M. At the time Safra allegedly never mentioned his firm's involvement with the state of Minnesota, despite a contract clause mandating that Covington notify 3M before taking on adverse clients.
Shortly afterwards, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson hired the firm. Swanson filed suit against 3M later that month, alleging that the company's perfluorochemicals, used to make stain-resistant products such as Scotchgard, polluted the state's water.
3M is seeking compensatory and consequential damages, the return of all legal fees it paid to Covington over the past two decades and an injunction to keep the firm from “further jeopardizing 3M's confidential information.”
Read more at Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of law firm news, read:
In late 2010,
Unsurprisingly, the technology company wasn't happy with the switch, and is now suing its former firm for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty.
According to 3M's complaint, Covington had advised 3M for decades, often on environmental matters. In the 1980s, the law firm helped 3M defend its food packaging products to the Food & Drug Administration (FDA), and it counseled the company again in the 1990s, when the FDA and Environmental Protection Agency investigated the tech giant's fluorochemical business.
But in December 2010, according to the complaint, Covington partner Seth Safra sought to terminate the firm's involvement with 3M. At the time Safra allegedly never mentioned his firm's involvement with the state of Minnesota, despite a contract clause mandating that Covington notify 3M before taking on adverse clients.
Shortly afterwards, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson hired the firm. Swanson filed suit against 3M later that month, alleging that the company's perfluorochemicals, used to make stain-resistant products such as Scotchgard, polluted the state's water.
3M is seeking compensatory and consequential damages, the return of all legal fees it paid to Covington over the past two decades and an injunction to keep the firm from “further jeopardizing 3M's confidential information.”
Read more at Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of law firm news, read:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250