Time winding down on Dewey & LeBoeuf’s new clawback proposal
The clock is ticking on Dewey & LeBoeufs attempts to reach a clawback settlement with former partners. And with a week to go before the Aug. 7 deadline, response to the firms latest proposed deal is reportedly mixed.
July 30, 2012 at 08:30 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The clock is ticking on Dewey & LeBoeuf's attempts to reach a clawback settlement with former partners. And with a week to go before the Aug. 7 deadline, response to the firm's latest proposed deal is reportedly mixed.
While Dewey's new plan addresses some partners' concerns by raising the maximum contributions for higher-paid partners and levying further fees on firm management, some former lawyers are still unhappy with the proposed terms. The revised settlement would offer lawyers immunity from future lawsuits in exchange for payments of between $5,000 and $3.5 million. Executive committee members would pay an additional 20 percent, prorated based on time worked between October 2007 and December 2011.
But the deal hasn't resolved all partner complaints, according to the Wall Street Journal. Some employees pointed out that the plan does not affect contributions from partners making mid-level compensation. Another disgruntled contingent: the lawyers who deferred some of their 2010 compensation until 2011 to help the firm's financial situation, and now find themselves on the hook for more money.
Meanwhile, documents filed Thursday in bankruptcy court reveal that Dewey paid more than $7 million to bankruptcy lawyers and consulting firms in the two months before it went belly-up. That total included a $1.6 million bill from law firm Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel and a $1.4 million payout to lead bankruptcy counsel Togut, Segal & Segal.
The filings also show that, prior to its demise, Dewey disclosed its financial statements to Baker & McKenzie, Greenberg Traurig, Patton Boggs, Reed Smith and SNR Denton, leading some to speculate that the firms may have discussed mergers or other transactions in an attempt to stave off Dewey's Chapter 11 bankruptcy. (Merger talks with Baker & McKenzie and Reed Smith had not previously become public).
These legal fees are a drop in the bucket of Dewey's $315 million debt. Since declaring Chapter 11 in May, the firm has reportedly collected $19 million from clients; it could recover an additional $90.4 million if the new clawback settlement succeeds.
Get a breakdown of Dewey's new clawback deal at the Wall Street Journal.
Read more about the firm's bankruptcy court filings at Reuters.
And for more InsideCounsel coverage of Dewey & LeBoeuf, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250